Find Closest Approach Time in Equation of Path

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reshma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Path
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the time of closest approach in a path described by the equation \(\vec r = \vec r_0 + \vec A t\). The key point is that at the closest approach, the direction vector \(\vec A\) must be perpendicular to the position vector \(\vec r_0 + \vec A t\). By applying the dot product, the relationship \(\vec A \cdot \vec r_0 + |\vec A|^2 t = 0\) is established. This leads to the formula for the time of closest approach: \(t = -\frac{\vec r_0 \cdot \vec A}{|\vec A|^2}\). The discussion clarifies the geometric interpretation of the problem and confirms the derived equation.
Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
The equation of a path is of the form: \vec r = \vec r_0 + \vec A t
If 't' represents time, show that the time of closest approach is:
t = -\frac{\vec r_0 \cdot \vec A}{|\vec A|^2}

I am not really sure on how to proceed about this, but I made a crude approach by assuming \vec r and \vec r_0 to be perpendicular. I took the dot product with r0 on both sides of given equation.
-\vec r_0^2 = \vec A \cdot \vec r_0 t

I don't think this a right way to solve, please give some suggestions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Closest approach to what?
 
Oh sorry, I forget to add that. Find the distance of closest approach to the origin i. e. the distance from the origin to the line.
 
It's not \vec r_0 that's perpendicular to \vec r, it's \vec A.
At the point of closest approach, the vector in the direction of the line, that is, \vec A, is perpendicular to the position vector, \vec r_0+ \vec At itself. That is \vec A \cdot (\vec r_0+ \vec At= 0. That is, \vec A \cdot \vec r_0+ \vec A \cdot \vec A t= 0. Can you solve that for t?
 
Wow, thanks! That makes sense. :smile:
-\vec A \cdot \vec r_0 = |\vec A|^2t

t = -\frac{\vec r_0 \cdot \vec A}{|\vec A|^2}
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top