Solving 3D Vector Equation for ##\vec{y}##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robin04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a vector equation involving linearly independent vectors in three-dimensional space. The equation is given as a cross product involving the vectors and seeks to isolate the vector ##\vec{y}##.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the manipulation of the vector equation, discussing the implications of expressing ##\vec{y}## as a linear combination of the vectors involved. Questions arise regarding the role of the coefficient ##\gamma## and whether it can take on arbitrary values.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the assumptions made about the coefficients in the linear combination of vectors. Some guidance has been offered regarding the implications of linear independence and the conditions under which the equation holds true.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of ensuring that the vectors chosen are indeed linearly independent and that the calculations must satisfy the original vector equation. There is an acknowledgment of potential mistakes in earlier computations and the need for careful verification of results.

Robin04
Messages
259
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


Solve the following vector equation for ##\vec{y}##. ##\vec{a}##, and ##\vec{b}## are linearly independent vectors of the three dimensional space.

##\vec{a} \times (8\vec{y}+\vec{b}) = \vec{b}\times(-5\vec{y}+\vec{a})##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First I developed the brackets
##\vec{a}\times8\vec{y}+\vec{a}\times\vec{b} = \vec{b}\times(-5\vec{y})+\vec{b}\times\vec{a}##
I subtracted ##\vec{b}\times(-5\vec{y})## and ##\vec{a}\times\vec{b}## from both sides, so I get
##\vec{a}\times8\vec{y}-\vec{b}\times(-5\vec{y})=\vec{b}\times\vec{a}-\vec{a}\times\vec{b}## which also equals to
##\vec{y}\times(-8\vec{a}-5\vec{b}) = 2\vec{b}\times\vec{a}##

Then I expressed ##\vec{y}## as the linear combination of ##\vec{a}##, ##\vec{b}## and ##\vec{b}\times\vec{a}##
##\vec{y} = \alpha\vec{a}+\beta\vec{b}+\gamma\vec{b}\times\vec{a}## then I multiplied it (cross product) with ##-8\vec{a}-5\vec{b}##
##\vec{y}\times(-8\vec{a}-5\vec{b}) = -8\alpha(\vec{a}\times\vec{a})-5\alpha(\vec{a}\times\vec{b})-8\beta(\vec{b}\times\vec{a})-5\beta(\vec{b}\times\vec{b}) + \gamma(\vec{b}\times\vec{a})\times(-8\vec{a}-5\vec{b})##
##=(5\alpha-8\beta)(\vec{b}\times\vec{a})-8\gamma[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{a})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{a})]-5\gamma[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{b})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{b})]##
From the equation this has to be equal to ##2\vec{b}\times\vec{a}## so ##5\alpha-8\beta = 2## and ##\gamma = 0##

But if I make up an arbitrary ##\vec{y}## vector of this form and choose random ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}## (linearly independent of course) it doesn't satisfy the equation. Where did I mess up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So if ##\gamma = 0 ## then doesn't that mean that ##\vec{y}## is a linear combination of ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}## ?

When I computed it it seemed that ##\gamma## can be anything since the resultant ##\gamma## component term vectors are both perpendicular to ##\vec{a}## x ##\vec{b}##
 
jedishrfu said:
So if ##\gamma = 0 ## then doesn't that mean that ##\vec{y}## is a linear combination of ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}## ?

When I computed it it seemed that ##\gamma## can be anything since the resultant ##\gamma## component term vectors are both perpendicular to ##\vec{a}## x ##\vec{b}##
How did you get that ##\gamma## can be anything?
 
Both a and b are perpendicular to a x b , right? Assuming that neither a nor b are the zero vector.
 
Yes
 
so their cross products are zero and thus ##\gamma## can be any value, right?
 
Did you test it by choosing an a and b vector, construct a y vector and evaluate your original equation?

Perhaps there's a mistake in the check...
 
Let ##\vec{a} =
\begin{bmatrix}
1 \\
1 \\
1 \\
\end{bmatrix},
\vec{b} =
\begin{bmatrix}
1 \\
2 \\
1 \\
\end{bmatrix},
\vec{y} =
\begin{bmatrix}
2 \\
1 \\
0 \\
\end{bmatrix},
\vec{y}## has to be a good choice because ##5\cdot 2 - 8\cdot1 = 2##, and ##\vec{a},\vec{b}## are independendent.
##-8\vec{a}-5\vec{b}=
\begin{bmatrix}
-13 \\
-18 \\
-13 \\
\end{bmatrix}, \vec{y}\times(-8\vec{a}-5\vec{b}) =
\begin{bmatrix}
-13 \\
26 \\
-23 \\
\end{bmatrix}
##, but ##2\vec{b}\times\vec{a} =
\begin{bmatrix}
2 \\
0 \\
-2 \\
\end{bmatrix}
##
 
Wouldn't you compute y from the the ##\alpha, \beta, \gamma## values and the a and b vectors? and then show that a, b and y satisfy the original formula?
 
  • #10
Robin04 said:
##\vec{y}## has to be a good choice because ##5\cdot 2 - 8\cdot1 = 2##
If ##\alpha = 2## and ##\beta=1##, then you have the wrong ##\vec{y}##.
 
  • #11
jedishrfu said:
Wouldn't you compute y from the the ##\alpha, \beta, \gamma## values and the a and b vectors? and then show that a, b and y satisfy the original formula?
DrClaude said:
If ##\alpha = 2## and ##\beta=1##, then you have the wrong ##\vec{y}##.

Aah what a mistake I made there... I should have written the final form of y, I've mistaken ##\alpha,\beta,\gamma## for its components, but they are coefficients of ##\vec{a},\vec{b}##. It works now, thank you!

But ##\gamma## has to be 0, otherwise it doesn't work for me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
  • #12
Robin04 said:
Aah what a mistake I made there... I should have written the final form of y, I've mistaken ##\alpha,\beta,\gamma## for its components, but they are coefficients of ##\vec{a},\vec{b}##. It works now, thank you!

But ##\gamma## has to be 0, otherwise it doesn't work for me.

My feeling is that ##\gamma## can be any value but perhaps @DrClaude can comment on it.
 
  • #13
Could you show it with equations, please?
 
  • #14
let a = (1,0,0) and b=(0,1,0) and so a x b = ( 0,0,1)

then y=(8,-5,10) where ##\beta = (-5/8) \alpha##.

I chose ##\alpha = 8## and so ##\beta = -5## and arbitrarily chose ##\gamma = 10##

a x (8y) + a x b = (0,80,-40) + (0,0,1) = (0,80,-39)

b x (-5y) + b x a = (-50,0,40) + (0,0,-1) = (-50,0,39)

Well, I didn't succeed! I see where I got ##\gamma## wrong now and I think you're right, it must be zero.

----------------------

Let y = ##\alpha## a + ##\beta## b + ##\gamma## (a x b)

then ##\alpha## a x (8a + 5b) = 0 + 5 ##\alpha## ( a x b)

and ##\beta## b x ( 8a + 5b) = -8 ##\beta## (a x b) + 0

and ##\gamma## (a x b) x (8a + 5b) = 8##\gamma## (a x b) x a + 5##\gamma## (a x b) x b

...
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Robin04 said:
##\vec{y}\times(-8\vec{a}-5\vec{b}) = -8\alpha(\vec{a}\times\vec{a})-5\alpha(\vec{a}\times\vec{b})-8\beta(\vec{b}\times\vec{a})-5\beta(\vec{b}\times\vec{b}) + \gamma(\vec{b}\times\vec{a})\times(-8\vec{a}-5\vec{b})##
##=(5\alpha-8\beta)(\vec{b}\times\vec{a})-8\gamma[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{a})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{a})]-5\gamma[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{b})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{b})]##
From the equation this has to be equal to ##2\vec{b}\times\vec{a}## so ##5\alpha-8\beta = 2## and ##\gamma = 0##
You found
$$
-8\gamma[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{a})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{a})]-5\gamma[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{b})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{b})] = 0
$$
from which either ##\gamma = 0## or
$$
8[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{a})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{a})]+5[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{b})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{b})] = 0
$$
With a bit of algebra, you can transform this into the equation ##c_1 \vec{a} = c_2 \vec{b}##, which contradicts ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}## being linearly independent (except if ##c_1 = c_2 = 0##, but you can eliminate that possibility for real vectors).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Robin04 and jedishrfu
  • #17
DrClaude said:
You found
$$
-8\gamma[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{a})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{a})]-5\gamma[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{b})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{b})] = 0
$$
from which either ##\gamma = 0## or
$$
8[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{a})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{a})]+5[\vec{a}(\vec{b}\vec{b})-\vec{b}(\vec{a}\vec{b})] = 0
$$
With a bit of algebra, you can transform this into the equation ##c_1 \vec{a} = c_2 \vec{b}##, which contradicts ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}## being linearly independent (except if ##c_1 = c_2 = 0##, but you can eliminate that possibility for real vectors).
Aah, so this would have been the precise way of saying this, I should have known!

Thank you all for you help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
56
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K