Find current for circuit with capacitor, resistor, capacitor in series

AI Thread Summary
To solve the circuit problem involving two capacitors and a resistor in series, the initial approach used Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to derive the current function over time. The equations were simplified to show a relationship between the current and the derivatives, but an inconsistency arose due to both capacitors having the same value, leading to an incorrect equivalent resistance. The discussion suggests reconsidering the signs of one capacitor or adjusting the combined capacitance to 0.5uF to align with the passive configuration. This highlights the importance of correctly accounting for the configuration and values of circuit components in calculations.
Cyrus
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
17
I have to solve this problem for a circuit. Its a capacitor, a resistor and another capacitor all in series.

Both capacitances are the same, 1uF, and the resistor is 100k-Ohm.

I have to find the current function of time.

What I did was use KVL to get:


- \frac{1}{c_1} \int i(t)dt + v_1 (t_0) + \frac{1}{c_2} \int i(t)dt + v_2 (t_0) + R i(t) = 0

Then I took the derivative to get:

- \frac{1}{c_1} i(t) + R \frac {di}{dt} + \frac{1}{c_2}i(t) =0

Which simplifies to:

R( \frac{1}{c_2} - \frac {1}{c_1} )^{-1} \frac {di}{dt} +i(t) = 0

But the two capacitances have the same value, which means that RC-eq is zero. That's wrong...hmmmmmmmmm
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
WTF. Why not change the signs of one of the capacitances. They should have the same sign. Or just let the combined capacitance equal to .5uF.
 
Because based on the diagram, they are in the passive configuration which is why it is negative.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top