Find direction of acceleration from potential-energy funct.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the acceleration of a block in the xy-plane, given a potential-energy function U(x, y) = (5.80 J/m²)x² - (3.60 J/m³)y³. The user seeks clarification on why the x-component of acceleration becomes positive when using the arctan function to find the angle. It is explained that the arctan function only takes one argument, the ratio of y to x, which can lead to ambiguity in determining the correct quadrant for the angle if either component is negative. Users must adjust the resulting angle based on the signs of the components to accurately represent the direction of acceleration. Understanding these nuances is crucial for correctly interpreting the results in physics problems involving potential energy and acceleration.
Grawlix
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small block with mass 0.0400 kg is moving in the xy-plane. The net force on the block is described by the potential-energy function U(x, y) = (5.80 J/m2)x2-(3.60 J/m3)y3. What are the magnitude and direction of the acceleration of the block when it is at the point (x = 0.300 m, y = 0.600 m)?

Homework Equations


U(x, y) = (5.80 J/m2)x2-(3.60 J/m3)y3

The Attempt at a Solution


I've attached the solution as an image; it was given to me with the question. Why does the x-component of acceleration becomes positive when plugged into arctan to find the angle?
 

Attachments

  • Why is x component of acceleration positive..PNG
    Why is x component of acceleration positive..PNG
    18 KB · Views: 1,285
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Grawlix,

The arctan function takes one argument. We typically concoct that argument as a ratio of two numbers, the y and x components of a vector. So something like: θ = arctan(y/x).

Now the problem that arises is that if one or the other of the x or y components is negative, the arctan function cannot tell whether to assign the negative sign to the numerator or denominator as it only "sees" the result of the division y/x. Similarly, if both terms are negative the arctan function sees a positive argument, and there's no indication that either term was ever negative.

So it falls to the user of the arctan function to correctly place the resulting angle in the correct quadrant of the Cartesian plane according to his special knowledge of the signs of the components involved. This means adjusting the result of the arctan function accordingly.
 
  • Like
Likes Grawlix
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top