Find Dist. b/w 2 Points in 3D Space incl. Time Dim.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of calculating the distance between two points in 3D space while incorporating a time dimension, specifically through the use of the equation ds^s=dx^2+dz^2+dy^2-(cdt)^2. Participants explore the implications of this equation, its interpretation as a proper interval, and the conditions under which it applies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the basic formula for distance in 3D space and questions whether the equation ds^s=dx^2+dz^2+dy^2-(cdt)^2 represents the distance in 3D space including time.
  • Another participant identifies ds^s as the proper interval, explaining that it can yield a negative value for points connected by a light beam, and discusses its invariance under Poincare transformations.
  • A different participant emphasizes that using the 4D spacetime equation assumes the two points are in the same rest frame, implying dt = 0 for distance calculations.
  • One participant cautions against the use of the term "distance," clarifying that the line element measures arc length along a curve and is not equivalent to the distance between two points in 3D space, which requires a metric tensor.
  • Another participant corrects a previous statement regarding the conditions for the proper interval, noting that it is zero for points joined by a light beam and discussing the context of inertial curves.
  • There are expressions of apology for earlier misstatements, indicating a recognition of the complexity of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the equation and the terminology used, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus on the definitions and implications of the concepts discussed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in the definitions of distance and proper interval, as well as the assumptions regarding the reference frames of the points in question. There is also a lack of resolution regarding the correct interpretation of the metric and its application in different contexts.

zepp0814
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
so i am hoping that all of you are familiar with the fact that a basic way of finding the distance between two points in 3d space is a^2+b^2+z^2=c^2. anyway i wanted to know in the equation ds^s=dx^2+dz^2+dy^2-(cdt)^2 does this show the distance between two points in in 3-d space including 1 time Dimension or does it show something different. also is this is the distance between 2 point then is there a unit of measurement of is the distance really something like -3.45E17.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This

ds^s=dx^2+dz^2+dy^2-(cdt)^2

is also called the proper-interval, and for points (4D points) that can be joined by a light-beam the proper-distance is negative ( using your metric equation).

It is important because we identify it with the time ticked on a clock while traveling along a curve.

It is invariant under the Poincare group of transformations - i.e. Lorentz boosts, 3d rotations and 4d translations.

As you've written it, the unit of ds is length, but if you divide through by c2, the unit is time.

See this thread https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=666591
 
zepp0814 said:
so i am hoping that all of you are familiar with the fact that a basic way of finding the distance between two points in 3d space is a^2+b^2+z^2=c^2. anyway i wanted to know in the equation ds^s=dx^2+dz^2+dy^2-(cdt)^2 does this show the distance between two points in in 3-d space including 1 time Dimension or does it show something different. also is this is the distance between 2 point then is there a unit of measurement of is the distance really something like -3.45E17.

If you are talking about calculating the distance between 2 points in 3D space using the 4D spacetime equation, then you are implicitly assuming that the two points lie within the same rest frame, such that dt = 0.
 
The term distance should be used carefully here. The line element (called first fundamental form in classical differential geometry) measures the arc length of a segment between two points on the curve; in the way you have written it we have an infinitesimal arc length of neighboring points on a curve. This is not the same thing as the distance between two points in 3 - space for which we use a metric. The line element involves the metric tensor.
 
thanks
 
Mentz114 said:
This

ds^s=dx^2+dz^2+dy^2-(cdt)^2

is also called the proper-interval, and for points (4D points) that can be joined by a light-beam the proper-distance is negative ( using your metric equation).

ds^2 = ...

I think you mean "joined by a _timelike_ curve"... "the [square-]interval is negative".
When joined by a light-beam, the square-interval is zero.


It is important because we identify it with the time ticked on a clock while traveling along a curve.

..."[minus c^2 multiplied by the square of the] time ticked on a clock while traveling along an _inertial_ curve" between two nearby events.
 
robphy said:
ds^2 = ...

I think you mean "joined by a _timelike_ curve"... "the [square-]interval is negative".
When joined by a light-beam, the square-interval is zero.

..."[minus c^2 multiplied by the square of the] time ticked on a clock while traveling along an _inertial_ curve" between two nearby events.
Yes, I expressed my self very badly. I meant to say in the light-cone. Sigh. My apologies to the OP for making such a blue of my answer.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
82
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 141 ·
5
Replies
141
Views
10K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K