Find E field for a ring of charge - Charge per length non-uniform

venkman1080
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have to find the E field at all points on the z-axis for a ring of charge with radius = R. \lambda(\phi) = \lambda_0 cos(\phi) where 0 \leq \phi < 2 \pi

I know how to do the problem when it is the charge per length is uniform but when I do the calculation for the non-uniform case I get E = \frac{-kR\lambda_0\pi}{(R^2 + z^2)^{3/2}} \hat{i} The integral for the j_hat part goes to zero because sin(phi)cos(phi) from 0 to 2 Pi and the z_hat part also goes to zero because the integral of cos(phi) from 0 to 2 Pi is zero.

I think my calculations are right, but I'm not totally sure. I just find it strange that its only in the i_hat. Any help/suggestions is greatly appreciated.

I used the formulas
<br /> E = \int_{charge} \frac{kdq}{r_\delta ^2}\hat{r_\delta}<br />

<br /> r_\delta = -R cos(\phi)\hat{i} - R sin(\phi)\hat{j} + x\hat{k}<br />

<br /> \hat{r_\delta} = \frac{-R cos(\phi)\hat{i}}{\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}}<br /> - \frac{R sin(\phi)\hat{j}}{\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}} + \frac{z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}}<br />

<br /> dq = \lambda Rd\phi<br />
Sorry if there is any typos with the latex formulas. I kept doing the preview post and it wouldn't change what I had entered the first time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
venkman1080 said:
The integral for the j_hat part goes to zero because sin(phi)cos(phi) from 0 to 2 Pi and the z_hat part also goes to zero because the integral of cos(phi) from 0 to 2 Pi is zero.

Sounds like you're multiplying every component by an extra factor of \cos\phi before integrating...why are you doing that?
 
I thought because \lambda(\phi) = \lambda_0 cos(\phi) so when you do the integral the cos doesn't pull out.
 
venkman1080 said:
I thought because \lambda(\phi) = \lambda_0 cos(\phi) so when you do the integral the cos doesn't pull out.

Yes, I overlooked that. Your answer looks good to me.
 
I'm just having trouble visualizing why the answer is only in the i_hat. Can you help clarify this for me?
 
Think symmetry. For every spot on the ring, there's a spot on the opposite side with the same charge in magnitude but with opposite sign.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top