Find ε1: EMF Homework on Infinite Straight Wire & Conductor Loop

  • Thread starter Thread starter fredrogers3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the induced electromotive force (emf) in a conducting loop due to a time-varying current in an infinite straight wire. At time t = 7 s, the current is increasing, which leads to an increasing magnetic flux through the loop. There is confusion regarding the direction of the induced current; the key indicates it should be counterclockwise, resulting in a negative emf. The rationale presented argues that since the flux is increasing, Lenz's law suggests a clockwise current to oppose this change, but the right-hand rule indicates otherwise. The resolution lies in understanding that the induced magnetic field must oppose the increase in flux, thus confirming the counterclockwise direction of the induced current.
fredrogers3
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An infinite straight wire carries a current I that varies with time as shown above. It increases from 0 at t = 0 to a maximum value I1 = 3.7 A at t = t1 = 14 s, remains constant at this value until t = t2 when it decreases linearly to a value I4 = -3.7 A at t = t4 = 30 s, passing through zero at t = t3 = 24.5 s. A conducting loop with sides W = 30 cm and L = 61 cm is fixed in the x-y plane at a distance d = 46 cm from the wire as shown.

What is ε1, the induced emf in the loop at time t = 7 s? Define the emf to be positive if the induced current in the loop is clockwise and negative if the current is counter-clockwise.

Image: http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/7218/h17bfromwire.png

Homework Equations


See Below


The Attempt at a Solution



My question on the problem concerns the direction of the induced EMF. The key says it should be negative and thus a current going counterclockwise. I'm a bit confused by this. At time t= 7s, the flux is increasing because the current is increasing. Therefore, by Lenz' law, wouldn't there be an induced magnetic field into the page to offset this positive change in flux. If so, by the right hand rule, doesn't this mean that the current must flow clockwise in the loop. That's my rationale, I can't see where I'm going wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The flux of the wire is increasing downwards through the loop. That is according to the right-hand rule it is coming from the top downwards through the loop. This means that the magnetic field of the loop need to be directed upwards to decrease the flux so that the current in it will be counterclockwise.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top