Find eccentricity of orbit after star has lost mass

refractor
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Initially, a planet with mass m moves on a circular orbit (r = R) around a star with mass M. Now M is instantaneously decreased to M'. Find the eccentricity e of the elliptical orbit the planet now follows.

Homework Equations



specific angular momentum l = L/m

\frac{\mbox{total energy}~ E}{m} = \frac{1}{2}v_r^2 + \frac{1}{2}\frac{l^2}{r^2} - \frac{γM}{r}

The effective potential is:

V_{eff}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{l^2}{r^2} - \frac{γM}{r}

click

The Attempt at a Solution



The mimimum of the effective potential is at R. But then as M->M' the minimum is shifted upwards and to the right. Energy is not conserved: the potential becomes less negative and kinetic energy also increases

The radius of the circular orbit R provides us with the semi-axis b of the ellipse, because at the moment of mass loss M -> M' the planet will leave it's circular orbit and enter the elliptical orbit at perihelion. The circle lies exactly inside the ellipse.

The mass loss does not effect angular momentum because the gradient of the potential is parallel to r, so the force responsible for the change of orbit is also only acting parallel to r.

l_{circle} = R^2 \omega

Now I have to find a relation between l and e, but I'm stuck on how to calculate the angular momentum of the elliptical orbit. I don't even know it's period. Thanks for reading!
Michael
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check "Kepler problem" on wikipedia.

See here the relation between the energy, eccentricity and angular momentum of the motion.
 
sorry, this relation is known but it doesn't solve the problem. Could anybody help?
 
That is precisely the relation you need... just look at the derivation a little longer.

For the angular momentum is conserved, so you just need to calculate the angular momentum in the first case with the circular orbit. (suppose the star is fixed ...)

This is simply:

L=mR^2\omega

Where the angular velocity can simply be calculated (circular motion provided by gravity):

\omega = \sqrt{\frac{\gamma M}{R^2}}

Use this to find the angular momentum ... and then use the relation...
 
I think I still haven't understood. I'd say it's

\omega = \sqrt{\frac{\gamma M}{R^3}}


and thus


L = m\sqrt{\gamma M R}

In my first post I wrote angular momentum is conserved, but why does it depend on M?
And provided we are talking about this formula:

e = \sqrt{1 + \frac{2EL^{2}}{k^{2}m}}


...how would it help me to calculate the eccentricity? Total energy E is not conserved and is thus not a constant in this equation.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top