Find Equation for the Parabola- Help, Please?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dmbeluke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola
AI Thread Summary
To find the equation of the parabola defined by the intersections of the given lines, first determine the intersection points by solving the systems of equations. The general form of a parabola is y = ax^2 + bx + c, where a, b, and c are constants. By rearranging the line equations, you can set up a system to solve for these constants using the intersection points. The y-intercept is confirmed at (0,0), and the other x-intercept is found to be at x = -4, with the vertex located at (-4,64). This information allows for the construction of the parabola's equation.
dmbeluke
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Each pair of the following three lines cross at a point. Those points are the y-intercept, one of the x-intercepts, and the vertex of a parabola. Can you please explain to me how to find an equation for the parabola? And the other x- intercept?

y+8x=32
y+5x=32
y+3x=12

I have been trying everything I can think of. I think they cross at 0. And I know the equation has to be squared, but I'm so lost on this one, I don't know what else to do. Any advice would be appriciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Step 1:
Determine the 3 pairs of (x,y)-values that solves the 3 pairwise systems of linear equations.
Let's call these:
{r}_{1}=(x_{1},y_{1}),<br /> {r}_{2}=(x_{2},y_{2}),<br /> {r}_{3}=(x_{3},y_{3})<br />

Step 2.
The general equation for a parabola when the y-coordinate is a function of the x-coordinate is:
<br /> y=ax^{2}+bx+c, where a, b,c are constants.

You do know something of the parabola you're after, namely that the 3 pairs r_{1},r_{2},r_{3} are on it.
How can this information be used in order to determine a,b,c?
 


To find the equation for a parabola, we first need to understand the general form of a parabola. A parabola can be written in the form y = ax^2 + bx + c, where a, b, and c are constants. In this case, we have three equations with three unknowns (a, b, and c), so we can solve for them using a system of equations.

First, let's rearrange the equations to put them in the form y = ax^2 + bx + c:

y = 32 - 8x
y = 32 - 5x
y = 12 - 3x

Now, we can set up a system of equations by equating the coefficients of x^2, x, and the constants on both sides:

32 - 8x = a + bx + c
32 - 5x = a + bx + c
12 - 3x = a + bx + c

We can solve this system using any method we are comfortable with, such as substitution or elimination. For simplicity, let's use substitution:

From the first equation, we get:

a = 32 - 8x - bx - c

Substituting this into the second equation, we get:

32 - 5x = (32 - 8x - bx - c) + bx + c

Simplifying, we get:

32 - 5x = 32 - 8x

Solving for x, we get:

x = 4

Now, we can substitute this value of x into any of the original equations to solve for a, b, and c. Let's use the first equation:

y = 32 - 8(4) = 0

So, the y-intercept of the parabola is (0,0). This confirms what you mentioned in your post.

To find the other x-intercept, we can use the fact that the x-intercepts are symmetric about the vertex. Therefore, the other x-intercept will be at x = -4. Substituting this into any of the equations, we get the y-coordinate of the vertex:

y = 32 - 8(-4) = 64

So, the vertex of the parabola is at (-4,64).

Now, we can substitute these values into the general form of a parabola to get the equation:

y
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top