Find Expected Value for p - Can You Suggest a Quicker Way?

bznm
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
I have done a lot of counts but I'm sure that there will be a quicker way.. Can you suggest me?

We have a particle in 1D that can moves only on ##[0,a]## because of the potential ##V(x)=\begin{cases}0, x\in(0,a)\\ \infty, otherwise\end{cases}##

At t=0, ##\displaystyle\psi(x,0)=\frac{\phi_1(x)+e^{i\gamma}\phi_2(x)}{\sqrt2}##

Find the expected value for ##p##.

I have followed the way ##\bar{p}=-i \hbar\int \psi(x)* \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi(x) \ dx##...

Can I follow a quicker way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that integral too lengthy to compute?
 
It is, but what it asks me to compute after that is even longer.. ##\bar {p}^2##!

Can't I express the state at t=0 as: ##| \psi(x,0)>=\frac{1}{\sqrt2} (|1>+e^{i \gamma} |2>##?
 
How is it lengthy, it's just integral of product sinusoids, you can make use of their (anti)symmetry property to eliminate some terms without actually calculating it.
 
mmh.. for example?
 
##p^2## is much easier than ##p##. I just computed its expectation value in my head.

This is because ##p^2## is a special operator for this problem. It's specialness is related to the definition of ##\phi_n##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top