Find Expression for Acceleration of Figure w/ Frictionless Table

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the correct expression for the acceleration of two masses on a frictionless table. The user initially derived an expression for tension (T) and acceleration (a) but believes they made an error. They consider whether the correct formula should be a=(m_2*g)/(2*m_1+m_2) instead. The user also questions the relationship between the accelerations of the two masses, suggesting that if there is no slipping, one acceleration should be half of the other. The conversation highlights confusion over the assumptions made in the calculations and seeks clarification on the correct approach to solving the problem.
adventq
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
So the problem I am working on is: In the figure, find an expression for the acceleration of (assume that the table is frictionless). I have attached the figure of reference.

I have so far tried to solve by first looking at m2 to get:
2T-m_2*g=m_2*a so T= (m_2*(a+g))/2

Then by looking at m1 I got:
T=m_1*a so a=(m_2*g)/(2*m_1-m_2)
This is supposidely wrong.
Can anyone see what I did wrong and how to fix it?

Should it be a=(m_2*g)/(2*m_1+m_2) ?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
wheres the figure ?
 
sorry...forgot it at first
 
here is the image
 

Attachments

Any thoughts?
 
any smart person have any clue about where i went wrong?
 
how does a=(m_2*g)/(2*m_1+m_2) sound?
 
okay...when I assumed a1 not equal to a2 which i wasnt doing originally, i got 2T-m_2*g=-m_2*a_2 and T=m_1*a_1
sbsitiuting and shifting things around I got:

a_1=(m_2*g-m_2*a_2)/(2*m_1)

does thi seem right?

should my anyswer depend on a_2 or are they assumed to be the same, therefor giving me a=(m_2*g)/(2*m_1+m_2) ?

Can someone work the problem and tell me if they are getting what I have of something different?
 
notice that if there is no slipping, a_2 should be one half of a_1 because of the string.
 
  • #10
Did anyone solve this? I am working on the same problem and am completely stumped.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top