Find Limit of (x^2+1)/(x^2-4x+3) as x->3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seldini
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The limit of (x^2 + 1)/(x^2 - 4x + 3) as x approaches 3 does not exist due to a vertical asymptote at that point. The denominator factors to (x - 1)(x - 3), indicating that as x approaches 3 from the left, the limit approaches negative infinity, while from the right, it approaches positive infinity. This behavior confirms that the function is not continuous at x = 3. Graphing the function or using a calculator also shows that the limit does not exist. Understanding the function's behavior around the asymptote is crucial for analyzing limits in rational functions.
Seldini
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
lim x->3

(x^2+1)/(x^2-4x+3)

Can anyone show me how to find the limit of this one? Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seldini said:
lim x->3

(x^2+1)/(x^2-4x+3)

Can anyone show me how to find the limit of this one? Thanks guys.

is this from a certain side? (ie 3+ or 3- ?)

do you know what this graph looks like? is it a continuous function?
 
For a rational function of the form

\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}

provided g(c)\neq 0 and provided f(x) and g(x) are polynomials as in your case you can write

Lim_{x \rightarrow c} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \frac{Lim_{x \rightarrow c}f(x)}{Lim_{x \rightarrow c}g(x)}=\frac{f(c)}{g(c)}

Cheers
vivek
 
Last edited:
g(c)=0 in this case

I recommend you just graph it or make a table of values
 
The limit does not exist. There are some ways you can look at this. First of all, you can just put it into a calculator and you'll see it does not exist.

Another solution is,
the number will always be positive. The denominator however will not be. You can factor it and it becomes (x - 1)(x - 3). If x is a little bit less then 3 then the denominator is negative. If x is a little greater then 3 the denominator is positive. Hence, if youre approaching from the left side, the one-sided limit is negative infinite. From the right, it is positive infinite. As you get closer and closer to 3 from either side the magnitude constant increases because the denominator gets closer and closer to zero. Hence, on either side it will constantly increase but in different directions.

Is that valid? Or is that just verbal diarrhea?
 
Parth Dave said:
The limit does not exist. There are some ways you can look at this. First of all, you can just put it into a calculator and you'll see it does not exist.

Another solution is,
the number will always be positive. The denominator however will not be. You can factor it and it becomes (x - 1)(x - 3). If x is a little bit less then 3 then the denominator is negative. If x is a little greater then 3 the denominator is positive. Hence, if youre approaching from the left side, the one-sided limit is negative infinite. From the right, it is positive infinite. As you get closer and closer to 3 from either side the magnitude constant increases because the denominator gets closer and closer to zero. Hence, on either side it will constantly increase but in different directions.

Is that valid? Or is that just verbal diarrhea?

yes, the limit does not exist. the function is not continuous at that point, ie the limit from one side approaches negative infinity, the limit from the other side approaches infinity.
 
Parth Dave said:
The limit does not exist. There are some ways you can look at this. First of all, you can just put it into a calculator and you'll see it does not exist.

Another solution is,
the number will always be positive. The denominator however will not be. You can factor it and it becomes (x - 1)(x - 3). If x is a little bit less then 3 then the denominator is negative. If x is a little greater then 3 the denominator is positive. Hence, if youre approaching from the left side, the one-sided limit is negative infinite. From the right, it is positive infinite. As you get closer and closer to 3 from either side the magnitude constant increases because the denominator gets closer and closer to zero. Hence, on either side it will constantly increase but in different directions.

Is that valid? Or is that just verbal diarrhea?

Yes, it is valid. The only thing you left out was to first test and see if f(c) reduces to 0/0. If it does, you still have a limit, even though the function's not continuous. In this case, the numerator is equal to 10 at f(3), so you know you have a vertical assymptote and Parth Dave's analysis is right on the money.

A whole lot of common sense beats algebra on most days.
 
Back
Top