Find magnitude and direction of the vector

alexoftennis
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You are given a vector in the xy plane that has a magnitude of 85.0 units and a y component of -50.0 units

The two possibilities for its x component are +68.74 and -68.74

Assuming the x component is known to be positive, specify the vector which, if you add it to the original one would give a resultant vector that is 70.0 units long and points entirely in the -x direction.

Magnitude = ?
Direction = ? degree

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I found that the magnitude was 147.47 by
[(-138.74)^2+(50)^2]^(1/2) or 147.47.

The problem is I can't geet the direction in degrees. I did
arcsin(50/147.47)=19.82 but that is not right.

Please help thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You are trying to find the angles of a right triangle when you know all of its sides. Any trigonometric function will do, as long as you feed it with the right input.

EDIT: That was not really a good answer. You can use the above to find the angle of your vector, but you should probably draw a diagram and make it clear to yourself what angle you really are looking for. Take your vector, make it the center of the world, forget everything else and look at it; what angle describes the direction it is pointing in?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top