Find Min Force on Particle 3 with q1,q2,q3 Charges

AI Thread Summary
To minimize the net electrostatic force on particle 3, the forces from particles 1 and 2 must be calculated using the formula F=(1/4piε)qq/r^2. The net force simplifies to Fnet=e^2/piε(1/x^2+27/(8-x)^2), and taking the derivative leads to a polynomial equation. The polynomial simplifies to 8(7x^3-6x^2+48x+128) after factoring out common terms. Numerical tests and graphing can help identify the minimum force location, which is near the smaller charge. The discussion highlights the importance of careful notation and factoring to avoid errors in calculations.
derek181
Messages
57
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Particles 1 and 2 are fixed in place on an x-axis at a separation of L=8cm. Their charges are q1=e q2=-27e. Particle 3 with charge q3=4e is to be placed on the line between particles 1 and 2, so that they produce a net electrostatic force F3net on it. a) at what coordinate should particle 3 be placed to minimize the magnitude of that force.


Homework Equations



F=(1/4piε)qq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Both forces are acting rightward.
So Fnet=(1/4piε)(q1*q3)/x^2+(1/4piε)(q2*q3)/(8-x)^2

This simplifies down to Fnet=e^2/piε(1/x^2+27/(8-x)^2)

Now take the derivative to minimize function

d(Fnet)/dx=(54e^2x^3-2e^2(8-x)^3)/piε(8-x)^3x^3

Set it to zero and my polynomial in the numerator is 8e^2(7x^3-6x^2+48x+128) and there is no min value in between 0 and 8!

Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show how you go from 54x^3-2(8-x)^3 to 8(7x^3-6x^2+48x+128) ? they are not the same.

(sorry for the notation, you too should use "Go Advanced" or read the guidelines point 6 for something more legible)...
 
54e2x3-2e2(8-x)3
first step
(8-x)3=512-192x+24x2-x3
Multiply that by -2e2 to get -1024e2+384e2x-48e2x2+2e2x3

Then ad the 54e2x3 to get 56e2x3-482x2+384e2x-1024e2

Then factor out 8e2 so 8e2(7x3-6x2+48x+128)

set that to zero and consequently get rid of the 8e2 leaving you with the polynomial 7x3-6x2+48x+128 in the numerator
 
Check the signs factoring out 8e^2 : why do only 3 out of four signs remain the same ?

Tip: factor out 4e^2/piε (a.k.a. ##4e^2\over 4\pi\epsilon_0^2##) right at the beginning. You are doing real work and you'll have less work and less chance of errors. The ##e^2## really blurs the picture, especially in the notation you use (but I suppose that's on PF only :smile:)

Then: If you are really stuck (and I'm with you there: it took me a long time to sort things out just as well), you can always do several more things:
  1. Make a graph - qualitatively at first. F runs away at x=0 and at x=8, and it definitely isn't infinite all over, so |F| MUST have a minimum.
  2. Do some numerical tests, x=1 F≈1.55, x=7 F≈27 so you'll have to end up somewhere near the smaller charge (of course).
 
Ahhhhh, geez. Thanks. It's always the simplest mistakes that get past me. Should have been -128 and I get a root of 2.
 
Happens to everybody. Hope the tips come in useful someday...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top