Find Out if Diffraction Grating Can Resolve Wavelengths 5800 & 5802 Angstroms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of lines per centimeter on a diffraction grating and determining its ability to resolve two closely spaced wavelengths, 5800 and 5802 Angstroms. The calculations indicate that the grating has approximately 2500 lines per cm. To assess the resolving power, participants suggest finding the angular separation between the diffraction maxima of the two wavelengths. There is some confusion regarding the necessary calculations due to the angle of incidence and the varying definitions of the human eye's resolution power. Ultimately, the focus remains on accurately determining the grating's capability to resolve the specified wavelengths.
Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
A beam of light is incident normally on a diffraction grating of width 2cm. It is found that at 30 degrees, the nth order diffraction maximum for \lambda_1 = 5 \times 10^{-5}cm is superimposed on the (n + 1)th order of \lambda_2 = 4 \times 10^{-5}cm.

1]How many lines per cm does the grating have?
2]Find out whether the first order spectrum from such a grating can be used to resolve the wavelengths \lambda_3 = 5800 Angstrom units & \lambda_4 = 5802 Angstrom units.

My work:

1]If N ruling occupy a total width W, then slit width d=W/N.

d\sin \theta = n\lambda_1 = (n+1)\lambda_2

{2\over N}{1\over 2} = n\lambda_1 = (n+1)\lambda_2

5000n= 4000(n+1)[/tex] (in Angstrom units).<br /> <br /> So, I got: n = 4; which I substituted in the first equation and I got the total number of rulings <b>N = 0.5 x 10<sup>4</sup></b><br /> <br /> So, number of rulings per cm is: N/Total width = N/2 = 0.25 x 10<sup>4</sup><br /> <br /> Is this part correct?<br /> <br /> 2]For this part, I can find the difference between the 2 wavelengths:<br /> <br /> \Delta \lambda = 2 Angstrom units.<br /> How do I determine whether the grating has good resolving power or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think for your scond one you need to find the distance between n=1 nodal lines for each of the wavelengths and compare with the power of resolution of the human eye (look it up)
 
You mean I have to find the angular separation between the two lines in order to determine whether the resolution is good or not?
 
Hey someone please help me here...I am unable to get any breakthroughs. Different sources give different resolution power for human eye and I don't think it is needed in this problem. Is there some other way of determining whether the resolution is good or not?
 
In this problem, the beam of light is inclined at an angle of 30 degrees to the grating.

So,

d\sin \theta = n\lambda_1

won't be right as you will have to factor in the difference in path length because the beam of light is inclined at an angle of 30 degrees to the grating.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top