Find Overall Gradient from dz/dx & dz/dy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Faken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient
AI Thread Summary
To find the overall gradient from the components dz/dx and dz/dy, the correct approach is to calculate the magnitude of the gradient vector using the formula overall gradient = sqrt((dz/dx)^2 + (dz/dy)^2). This calculation provides the combined value of the gradients without considering direction. The discussion emphasizes that while the gradient is a vector field, the magnitude can be derived from the two given components in a two-dimensional context. Additionally, the conversation touches on the implications of this gradient in a physical scenario, such as the movement of a ball on a sloped surface. Understanding the distinction between the gradient vector and its magnitude is crucial in this context.
Faken
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have 2 components of a gradient, for example, the dz/dx and the dz/dy, I want to find the overall gradient it forms, how would I do that?

Is it simply by combining the two gradients like this:

overall gradient = ((dz/dx)^2 + (dz/dy)^2)^(1/2)

I don't need the direction, I don't really care about the direction, i just need the value of the combined gradients.

Thanks in advance

-FakenEdit:

Well, it seems that I'm not asking my question clearly enough, let me try again but this time with a physical example.Imagine a flat plate in 3D space that has a known slope in the x direction and the y direction (or dz/dx and dz/dy, in this case, we are using the right handed coordinate system with positive x going from left to right, positive y going away from you, and positive z going up).

If i place a ball on the plate and gravity acts on the ball in the negative z direction, which direction will the ball go (as viewed from above, or the path projected onto the XY plane), and what slope will the ball "see" going in that direction.

Basically its like converting Cartesian coordinates into polar coordinates, except I'm dealing with a gradient or slope.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The gradient of a function is a vector field. If you are working in 3D space, then the vector field has three components. You cannot find the magnitude without knowing all three components.
 
Ok maybe not 3d space.
 
What, exactly, do YOU mean by "overall gradient" then? If you start with two values, but the formula you then gives, assuming that z is a function of the two variables x and y, is for the magnitude of the gradient vector. The gradient vector itself is just \left(\partial z/\partial x\right)\vec{i}+ \left(\partial z/\partial y}\left)\vec{j}.
And, of course, you must be working in two dimensions, not three.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
722
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top