Find Real Value of sin(i) Without i

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCanadian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
I am calculating a value and want to find the real value of sin(i). I can use series expansion and only take the terms without i (correct?) but is there any nicer way to express the result of taking the real value of sin(i)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
micromass said:

I used the imaginary exponentials and found ## \sin(i) = \frac{e^{-1} - e}{2i} ## but this seems purely imaginary...from the sum expansion of sin, it appeared that there were real values for the even power terms. Any advice you have for addressing what I am missing here since I'm looking for the real value would be great!
 
Indeed, ##\sin(i)## is purely imaginary. If you look at the series expansion of ##\sin(i)##, you'll see that only ##i^{\text{odd power}}## appear in this expansion. And as you know, ##i^{\text{odd power}} = \pm i##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top