Find relationship between mass and a pseudo-variable

  • Thread starter Thread starter June_cosmo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Relationship
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the interior mass of a star using the relationship between mass and a pseudo-variable, specifically through the substitution of variables in the integral. The temperature function is given as θ(ξ) = sin(ξ) / ξ, and the density function is defined as ρ(ξ) = ρ_c * θ. The integration is performed from 0 to π to evaluate the mass function, with a normalization of the y-axis to range from 0 to 1. The confusion arises from the substitution of r² with ξ², which requires using the relationship r = αξ and applying the chain rule for differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus and analytic functions.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of density and temperature in astrophysics.
  • Knowledge of variable substitution in integrals.
  • Basic understanding of plotting functions and normalization techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of variable substitution in integrals, focusing on astrophysical contexts.
  • Learn about the chain rule in calculus and its implications for variable transformations.
  • Explore the concept of normalization in data visualization and its importance in scientific plotting.
  • Investigate the properties of analytic functions and their applications in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and anyone involved in stellar modeling and analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working on problems related to mass distribution and temperature functions in stars.

June_cosmo
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


https://dept.astro.lsa.umich.edu/~mmateo/Astr404_W16/WebPage/Assignment_Jan21.pdf

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Apologize for the long question. I was able to solve problem a and b. But for problem c, I was confused. I asked my professor and he gave me this explanation:

"I give you theta (the temperature) as a function of xi; as I recall, that solution is theta = sin(xi) / xi. And you know too that rho(xi) = rho_c * theta since n=1 for this case.

So now you calculate the interior mass by replacing rho(r) with with this expression for rho(xi) and r^2 with xi^2 and dr with dxi. Then integrate from 0 (the center) to values between 0 and pi (3.14159 since the surface of the star corresponds to xi=pi). For example, the integral is from 0 to 1 to get m(xi=1) and so forth. As you will see the integral is analytic, so this is just evaluating a simple function for values of xi between 0 and pi. Then you plot this, normalizing the y-axis to go from 0 to 1.0 and you can either leave xi to go from 0 to pi, or define a new varlable xi-prime = xi/pi and plot from 0 to 1 using xi-prime. "

so I am confused because xi=alpha*r,why can we substitute r^2 with xi^2? Even if we do this, we get a function with a few constants in it. How can we plot this function?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
June_cosmo said:
"I give you theta (the temperature) as a function of xi; as I recall, that solution is theta = sin(xi) / xi. And you know too that rho(xi) = rho_c * theta since n=1 for this case.

So now you calculate the interior mass by replacing rho(r) with with this expression for rho(xi) and r^2 with xi^2 and dr with dxi. Then integrate from 0 (the center) to values between 0 and pi (3.14159 since the surface of the star corresponds to xi=pi). For example, the integral is from 0 to 1 to get m(xi=1) and so forth. As you will see the integral is analytic, so this is just evaluating a simple function for values of xi between 0 and pi. Then you plot this, normalizing the y-axis to go from 0 to 1.0 and you can either leave xi to go from 0 to pi, or define a new varlable xi-prime = xi/pi and plot from 0 to 1 using xi-prime. "

so I am confused because xi=alpha*r,why can we substitute r^2 with xi^2?
You can't. Also, you have it slightly wrong; it's ##r = \alpha \xi##. You have to replace ##r^2## with ##(\alpha \xi)^2##, and use the chain rule to relate ##\frac{d}{dr}## to ##\frac{d}{d\xi}##.

Even if we do this, we get a function with a few constants in it. How can we plot this function?
That's why your professor said to plot the normalized function. You want ##m_\xi(\pi) = 1##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K