Find the acceleration : block slides on a wedge

AI Thread Summary
A block slides down a frictionless incline on a wedge, which is on a horizontal surface with friction. The problem requires proving that the wedge accelerates to the right with a specific formula involving gravity and the coefficient of friction. Participants suggest drawing a force diagram to understand the net forces acting on the wedge and emphasize the need for a kinematic relationship to ensure the block remains on the wedge. There is a mention of needing an additional equation to solve the problem due to having three equations with four unknowns. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly defining coordinate directions in the analysis.
pcpssam
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
sry for typo..it should be acceleration

Homework Statement



A block m slides down from a frictionless inclined surface (theta = 45) of a wedge, mass m, which is on a horizontal plane with coefficient of friction u. Prove that the wedge moves to the right with acceleration equal to g(1-3u)/(3-u) .

im stuck on this question for a whole week..but still can't get the answer
not sure if it is a question related to relative motion?
please help!

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As always, draw a force diagram.

If what you want is the acceleration of the wedge, you need to know the net force on the wedge. If you can't figure it out, post your working, and a photo of your diagram if possible.
 
f21618phyd223.png


cant get the relation of these three accelerations..
 
You have three equations in four unknowns - you just need one more. You just need to enforce that the block stays on the wedge and doesn't go flying off - kinematic equations may help.

One minor point - your ay has the same sign as g, but you have defined +y to be up the page. It doesn't affect your maths here, but it can do in general.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top