Find the charge on a piece of dust

  • Thread starter Thread starter brownca31089
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Dust
AI Thread Summary
To find the charge on a piece of dust in an electric field, the weight of the dust must be equated to the electric force acting on it. The weight is calculated using the mass (1.6 g) multiplied by gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s²). The electric force is determined by multiplying the charge (q) by the electric field strength (511 N/C). Setting the two forces equal allows for solving the charge, and subsequently, the number of excess electrons can be calculated. Understanding the distinction between mass and force is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
brownca31089
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small piece of dust of mass m = 1.6 g travels horizontally through an electric air cleaner in which the electric field is 511 N/C. The electric force on the particle is equal to the weight of the particle.
What is the charge on the dust particle?
If this charge is provided by an excess of electrons, how many electrons does that correspond to?

Homework Equations



I know i have to solve for q and that my mass is the same as my force..but i have no idea where to even start. any help is appreciated!

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass is not force.

Two forces involved here. Name them and compare their magnitudes (sizes).
 
well the reason why i think the mass and force are equal is because it said so in the problem.
 
No it did not.

Read it again. You seem to be making a fundamental error in a specific concept.
 
is there any way you can help me set it up? if i can get a beginning equation down i can do the rest of it.
 
Look at my first reply and answer the questions I asked.

I'll repeat, there are two forces involved (mass is still not a force; here on earth, what do you multiply mass with to get a force, and what is that force commonly known as?)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top