Find the Composite Function of p & q: Relationship & Value of pq(39.72)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the composite function of p(x) and q(x), where p(x) = (2−x) / (3 + x) and q(x) = (2−3x) / (1 + x). The user correctly identifies that pq(x) simplifies to x, indicating that p and q are inverse functions of each other. The exact value of pq(39.72) is also confirmed to be 39.72. Additionally, the conversation clarifies the distinction between the product and composition of functions, emphasizing the correct notation for composite functions. Overall, the functions p and q effectively cancel each other out, demonstrating their inverse relationship.
Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


p(x)=(2−x) / (3 + x) and q(x)= (2−3x) / (1+ x)

a) Find the function pq(x).
b) Hence describe the relationship between the functions p and q.
c) Hence write down the exact value of pq(39.72).

2. The attempt at a solution

a) I got pq(x) = x by substituting q(x) into p(x). Is this correct answer?

b) If pq(x) = x then the functions p and q are positive. Is this the correct answer?

c) pq(39.72) = 39.72 . Is this the correct answer?

Please let me know what I am doing wrong. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Natasha1 said:
I got pq(x) = x
Yes.
Natasha1 said:
then the functions p and q are positive
The question asks for the relationship between the functions.
 
Would you said they are inverse to each other?
 
Natasha1 said:
Would you said they are inverse to each other?
Yes.
 
They cancel each other out, right?
What about this question

Hence write down the exact value of pq(39.72)? Is that correct?
 
Natasha1 said:
They cancel each other out, right?
What about this question

Hence write down the exact value of pq(39.72)? Is that correct?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes Natasha1
Haruspex, could you please explain why these two functions are the inverse of one and the other?
 
Natasha1 said:
Haruspex, could you please explain why these two functions are the inverse of one and the other?

Assuming @haruspex has gone to bed:

If you have a function ##q## and you find another function ##p## such that ##p(q(x)) = x##, then by definition ##p## is the inverse of ##q##. By showing that ##p(q(x)) = x##, you have shown that these are inverses of each other. In that sense, there is nothing more to say.

But, you might ask how would you find ##p##, the inverse function?

If you let ##y = q(x)##, then this gives you the graph of ##q(x)##. To find the inverse function, you need to find ##x = p(y)##. Graphically, therefore, you simply swap the x and y axes and you have the graph of the inverse function.

You can also find the function algebraically. In this example, you have:

##y = q(x) = \frac{2- 3x}{1+x}##

You need to rearrange that and solve for ##x## in terms of ##y##. This gives you:

##x = \frac{2-y}{3+y} = p(y)##

And, that is your inverse function.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Natasha1
Thanks PeroK, much appreciated...

PS: Good night, haruspex :)
 
  • #10
@Natasha1, it's good that your title included the word "composite," because what you posted didn't look at all like the composition of two functions.

Natasha1 said:
a) Find the function pq(x).

This looks like the product of functions p and q. To talk about the composition of these functions, you should write the above as ##p(q(x))##, as PeroK did in post #8. Different notation with the same meaning is ##(p \circ q)(x)##.
 
Back
Top