MHB Find the cubic equation that has -1 and 2i as roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter pan90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Roots
AI Thread Summary
The cubic equation with roots -1 and 2i must also include the complex conjugate -2i, resulting in the polynomial f(x) = (x + 1)(x - 2i)(x + 2i). This expands to f(x) = (x + 1)(x^2 + 4), leading to the final cubic equation x^3 - x^2 + 4x - 4. The discussion emphasizes the importance of including complex conjugates for polynomials with real coefficients. Substituting the roots into potential equations can help identify the correct polynomial. The method confirms that multiple cubic equations can share the same roots.
pan90
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Answer is given, but no explanation or logic for it.

View attachment 9220

From HiSet free practice test
 

Attachments

  • cubic equation problem.jpg
    cubic equation problem.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 177
Mathematics news on Phys.org
pan90 said:
Answer is given, but no explanation or logic for it.
From HiSet free practice test
You need to show what you have tried, even if it is wrong. That will enable us to help you better.

Note that, for a polynomial with real coefficients, if we have a complex root then we also have the complex conjugate as a root as well. So your cubic polynomial is [math]f(x) = a( x - (-1))(x - (2i))(x - (-2i))[/math].

(The "a" is there because the polynomial will have the same roots no matter what constant is multiplying the whole thing. Your answer key is setting a = 1.)

-Dan

Edit: The method worked to give the right answer, but the signs were wrong. The terms for the given roots are of the form x - r, not x + r as I had originally written.
 
Substitute $x=-1$ and $x=2i$ in each of the given expressions. Do you get $0$? If the same expression gives $0$ for both these two values of $x$, then the equation is the one you’re looking for; otherwise, it isn’t.

Right, let’s do it one at a time. Start with $x=-1$. Substitute this in each of the five expressions A–E. You’ll find that B and D give you $0$ whereas A, C and E don’t. Therefore the correct answer is either B or D (you have eliminated A, C and E).

Now substitute $x=2i$ in B and in D. One will give you $0$ while the other won’t. The one that gives you $0$ is the one you’re looking for.
 
First, there exist an infinite number of different cubic equations that have "-1" and "2i" as roots, Notice that all of the proposed solutions have real coefficients. A polynomial equation with real coefficients but a non-real root must also have the complex conjugate of that non-real root as a root. The complex conjugate of "2i" is "-2i" so the polynomial must be (x+ 1)(x- 2i)(x+ 2i)= (x- 1)(x^2+ 4)= x^3- x^2+ 4x- 4.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top