Find the drift speed of of the electrons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the drift speed of electrons using the current and the number density of charge carriers. The current (I) is given as 0.167 A, and the relevant formula for drift speed (v_d) is established as v_d = I / (neA), where n is the number density of electrons and e is the elementary charge. Participants clarify the distinction between n (number density) and ne (charge density), emphasizing the need for correct units in calculations. The area used in the calculations is confirmed to be the cross-sectional area of the block, and the final calculations yield a drift speed after correcting initial errors in values and units. Accurate application of these equations is crucial for determining the drift speed effectively.
r-swald
Messages
13
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A solid, conductive, rectangular block with a resistance of 150 Ohm's has a cross-sectional area of .11m across it's width and a length of .2m. The block contains 1.2x10^19 conductive electrons, and a connected battery creates a 25v potential.
Relevant Equations
I = qVnA
I = V / R
n = # conductive electrons / m^3
I've found I to be .167 using the potential and resistance.

I also found the volume by multiplying the cross-sectional area by the length (?) and then dividing the # of conducting electrons into that to find packing density (n).

To find drift speed, I would also need the area of the block as well as the charge. I'm not sure wether the block is equal in it's height and width to use .11/2 to find those to use in the area equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a cross-section of the block at some point along its length. We'll assume that the charge carriers "drift" as one homogenous medium of charge with ##n = 1.2 \times 10^{19}## electrons per cubic metre, at a drift velocity of ##v_d##.

In a time ##\delta t##, the charge will have advanced ##v_d \delta t##. So if we multiply this by the cross sectional area, we obtain the total volume of this charge-filled medium that has passed through our cross section, namely ##V = Av_d \delta t##. It follows that the total charge that has passed through our cross section is ##Q = neAv_d \delta t##, since ##ne## is just the charge per unit volume.

But remember, current is defined as the rate of flow of charge past a given point in the circuit (in this case, through our cross sectional surface!). So ##I = \frac{neAv_d \delta t}{\delta t} = neAv_d##. This was the equation you gave in your relevant formulae section, and is in fact all you need to solve the question from what you have already worked out.

Can you rearrange that equation for ##v_d##?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes berkeman and r-swald
etotheipi said:
Consider a cross-section of the block at some point along its length. We'll assume that the charge carriers "drift" as one homogenous medium of charge with ##n = 1.2 \times 10^{19}## electrons per cubic metre, at a drift velocity of ##v_d##.

In a time ##\delta t##, the charge will have advanced ##v_d \delta t##. So if we multiply this by the cross sectional area, we obtain the total volume of this charge-filled medium that has passed through our cross section, namely ##V = Av_d \delta t##. It follows that the total charge that has passed through our cross section is ##Q = neAv_d \delta t##, since ##ne## is just the charge per unit volume.

But remember, current is defined as the rate of flow of charge past a given point in the circuit (in this case, through our cross sectional surface!). So ##I = \frac{neAv_d}{\delta t} = neAv_d##. This was the equation you gave in your relevant formulae section, and is in fact all you need to solve the question from what you have already worked out.

Can you rearrange that equation for ##v_d##?

Ok, so Vd = I / nA
is there a difference between n and ne?

I'm still not sure how to find the area to plug into this equation
 
r-swald said:
Ok, so Vd = I / nA
is there a difference between n and ne?
Yes. A factor of ##e##. It should be ##v_d = \frac{I}{neA}##.
r-swald said:
I'm still not sure how to find the area to plug into this equation
Which area makes the most sense? I.e. which one did I use in the derivation :wink:?
 
etotheipi said:
Yes. A factor of ##e##. It should be ##v_d = \frac{I}{neA}##.

Which area makes the most sense? I.e. which one did I use in the derivation :wink:?

I don't get it. Ok so I'm trying to find the drift speed of the electrons, I use this by dividing current (.167) by ne • A. You used cross-sectional area in your derivation so I'd use that, but I'm not sure what the factor of e is so I tried the packing density I found by dividing the "n" you used by volume (.022)

Vd = .167 / 5.45e20 • .11
= 2.79x10^-21

Not sure what I'm missing here, my professor didn't explain this one well
 
r-swald said:
You used cross-sectional area in your derivation so I'd use that,

This is correct. As for the other part,

##n## is the number density of electrons, the number of electrons in one cubic metre. This varies in different materials. ##e## is the elementary charge, ##1.6\times 10^{-10} C##.

Now ##n## has units of per cubic metre, and ##e## has units of charge. ##ne## has units of charge per cubic metre, ##C m^{-3}##! It follows that ##ne## times the volume is the total charge.

It's just a constant.
 
  • Like
Likes r-swald
There is a dimensional error in your statement of the problem...please identify it. And can we require units on the calculations please...
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
etotheipi said:
This is correct. As for the other part,

##n## is the number density of electrons, the number of electrons in one cubic metre. This varies in different materials. ##e## is the elementary charge, ##1.6\times 10^{-10} C##.

Now ##n## has units of per cubic metre, and ##e## has units of charge. ##ne## has units of charge per cubic metre, ##C m^{-3}##! It follows that ##ne## times the volume is the total charge.

It's just a constant.

1.6x10^-19? I used that number and it worked. I was also using the wrong number for n, it was given as the total number of charged particles within the block and then divided by the volume was the n I was looking for. I'd also converted cm to m incorrectly, but it all worked out in the end :) thanks for the help! those equations were super helpful
 

Similar threads

Back
Top