Find the equation of the circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter anil kumar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the equation of a circle that touches the line 2x + 3y + 1 = 0 at the point (1,-1) and is orthogonal to another circle defined by points (3,0) and (1,-3). The radius of the second circle is determined to be √13/2, leading to its equation. Participants highlight the need to derive the correct equations relating the unknowns a and b for the circle in question, emphasizing that it must satisfy both the tangency condition and orthogonality to the other circle. The final equation of the desired circle is found to be x^2 + (y + 5/2)^2 = 13/4 or (x - 2)^2 + (y - 1/2)^2 = 13/4.
anil kumar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A circle touches the line 2x + 3y +1 = 0 at the pt. (1,-1) and is orthogonal
to the circle whose one pair of diametrically opposite end pts. are (3,0) and
(1,-3).Find the equation of the circle.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You know the diameter of the second circle is \sqrt{(3-1)^2 + [0 - (-3)]^2} = \sqrt{13}. Therefore, the radius, r = \sqrt{13}/2, and r^2 = 13/4

Now the second circle can be represented by the equation:

(x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2 = r^2

(x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = 13/4

You can make two equations with two unknowns, and solve for a and b:

(1):\ \ (3-a)^2 + b^2 = 13/4

(2):\ \ (1-a)^2 + (3+b)^2 = 13/4

a = 2,\ b = -1.5

This should help you get started.
 

Attachments

  • circles.JPG
    circles.JPG
    8.4 KB · Views: 470
Now, let (m,n) be the center of the circle we are solving for. We know:

(1-m)^2 + (1+n)^2 = R^2

where R is the radius of the circle we're solving for. We also know that there must be points on the other circle, (x_1,y_1) and (x_2,y_2)[/tex] such that:<br /> <br /> (x_1 - 2,y_1 + 1.5) \cdot (x_1 - m, y_1 - n) = 0<br /> <br /> (x_2 - 2,y_2 + 1.5) \cdot (x_2 - m, y_2 - n) = 0<br /> <br /> We also have:<br /> <br /> (x_1 - 2)^2 + (y_1 + 1.5)^2 = 13/4<br /> <br /> (x_2 - 2)^2 + (y_2 + 1.5)^2 = 13/4<br /> <br /> and:<br /> <br /> \frac{1-m}{-1-n} = 3/2<br /> <br /> and:<br /> <br /> (x_1-m)^2 + (y_1-n)^2 = R^2<br /> <br /> (x_2-m)^2 + (y_2-n)^2 = R^2<br /> <br /> 8 equations, 7 unknowns. Looks ugly, but possible.
 
Okay, perhaps someone can explain to me why this approach didn't work.

I started out with the three pieces of information that we have to begin with:

1) The equation of the circle is (x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = 13/4

2) The equation of the tangent line is 2x + 3x + 1 = 0

3) The line is tangent to the circle at the point (1,-1)

In other words, \frac{dy}{dx} at (1,-1) is -2/3

So I differentiated the equation of the circle to obtain the equation for \frac{dy}{dx}

\frac{d}{dx}(x - a)^2 + \frac{d}{dx}(y - b)^2 = \frac{d}{dx}13/4

If u = x - a and v = y - b,

then u\prime = 1 and v\prime = 1

I rewrote the equation as

\frac{d}{dx}u^2 + \frac{d}{dx}v^2 = \frac{d}{dx}13/4

2uu\prime + 2vv\prime = 0

2(x - a) + 2(y - b)\frac{dy}{dx} = 0

Solving for \frac{dy}{dx}, I got

2(y - b)\frac{dy}{dx} = -2(x - a)

\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{-2(x - a)}{2(y - b)} = -\frac{(x - a)}{(y - b)}

I then substituted in the known values for (x,y) and \frac{dy}{dx},

(1,-1) and -2/3

-2/3 = -\frac{(1 - a)}{(1 - b)}

The negatives cancel and we get

1 - a = 2 and -1 - b = 3

a = -1 and b = -4

Substituting these values back into the equation of the circle, we get

(x + 1)^2 + (y + 4)^2 = 13/4

Now this equation is not correct, as it never touches the point (1,-1). I'm sure I'm overlooking something very simple, but it's 1:30 AM here and I'm really tired. Can someone help me out?
 
Last edited:
Yes, you are overlooking something very simple: the circle we're asked to find doesn't (necessarily) have a radius of sqrt(13/4).

The circle with "diametrically opposite end pts. (3,0) and (1,-3)" has a radius of sqrt(13/4). Its equation is easy to find, since you know two points on it. AKG did it in his first post. This circle is not a tangent to 2x + 3y + 1 = 0.

What we're looking for is a totally different circle (that IS a tangent to 2x + 3y + 1 = 0). The only connection this new circle has with the old circle, is that they are orthogonal to each other.

*edit* That's not to say that you can't find a circle with a radius of sqrt(13/4) that is tangent to 2x + 3y + 1 = 0 at (1, -1). Let the circle's equation be (x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = 13/4. Work out its intersection with the tangent line. The discriminant must be zero. You now have an equation relating a and b. But since you also know that (1, -1) must lie on the circle, you have another equation with a and b. Two equations, two variables, should be solvable. In fact, if you slog through the calculations (or enlist a computer to do it for you ;)), you'll find that the equation is x^2 + (y + 5/2)^2 = 13/4 or (x - 2)^2 + (y - 1/2)^2 = 13/4.

You can apply the same technique (letting the circle's equation be (x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = r^2, though) to solve the original problem, only you have to apply the condition given on Mathworld... Very un-pretty though.

And now I see the mistake you did. If you have this equation:

-2/3 = -\frac{(1 - a)}{(1 - b)}

1 - a is not necessarily equal to 2, and 1 - b is not necessarily equal to 3. Since \frac{2}{3} = \frac{4}{6}, is 2 = 4 and 3 = 6?
 
Last edited:
A lot of the calculations you did are not necessary: The circle such that (3, 0) and (1, -3) has radius \frac{\sqrt{13}}{2} AND center at ((3+1)/2,(0-3)/2)=
(2, -3/2) so THAT circle is (x-2)2+ (y+ 3/2)2= 13/4.

The circle you want to find must be of the form (x-a)2+ (y-b)2= R2 (any circle is of that form). If it "touches" (is tangent to) the line
2x+ 3y+ 1= 0 then it must be tangent at (x,y) such that 2x+ 3y+ 1= 0 and
x2+ y2= R2. That's two equations for 3 unknowns.

In order to be perpendicular to the circle (x-2)2+ (y+ 3/2)2= 13/4, The must be two points (x,y) satisfying the equations of both circles and such that the derivatives y'= (y- 3/2)/(x- 2)= (y-b)/x-a). You need to solve all those equations for a and b.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top