# Find the equivalent capacitance

1. Apr 7, 2013

### mathnoobie

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

In the figure, C1 = C5 = 8.0 microF and C2 = C3 = C4 = 4.2 microF . The applied potential is Vab = 230V

2. Relevant equations
1/Ceq=1/C1+1/C2+....+1/Cn(for series connections)
Ceq=C1+C2+...+Cn

3. The attempt at a solution

So far I have tried to set C1 to C5 all in series, but that gives me the wrong solution.
I'm not sure what to do, could anyone hint me in the right direction?

File size:
12.2 KB
Views:
740
2. Apr 7, 2013

### willem2

Two capacitors are in series, if they are connected, and nothing else is connected to the point where the two capacitors are connected.
5 capacitors would be in series if they were alll connected in a string and nothing else is connected to any point between the capacitors. C1 to C5 are obviously not in series.
There are however 2 capacitors that are in series. You can replace them with their equivalent capacitance and continue from there.

3. Apr 7, 2013

### mathnoobie

C3 and C4 are in series, if I get their equivalent Capacitors, they would be in parallel with C2,
then C234 would be in series with C1 and C5?

edit: Yep, I got the answer, thank you :)
Quick question regarding series connections though.

The reason I was unable to say C1, C2, C5 were in series was because of the junction right?

Last edited: Apr 7, 2013
4. Apr 7, 2013

### dinospamoni

C1 and C5 are in series with each other on the path from a to b

That looks correct to me

5. Apr 7, 2013

### mathnoobie

I am confused on what you mean by this, could you explain further if possible?

6. Apr 7, 2013

### djh101

Just keep shrinking the circuit down by replacing individual capacitors with equivalence capacitors until you are down to a single Ceq. You can start by noticing that C3 and C4 are in series and replacing them with Ceq1. After doing this, you should notice that Ceq1 and C2 are in parallel, so you can replace them with Ceq2. After doing this, you should be left with 3 capacitors which are all in series.

It helps to redraw the circuit every time you replace capacitors with an equivalence capacitor.

7. Apr 7, 2013

### dinospamoni

Sure. With these problems, I like to find all possible paths from point a to point b.

In this case you can go from C1 to C2 to C5, or you can go from C1 to C3 to C4 to C5. Notice how C1 and C5 are in both paths. This means that you can't get from point a to point b without going through both C1 and C5, so they are in series.

Alternatively, C2 is in only the first while C3 and C4 are in only the second, so they are in parallel with each other. Note that C2 is only in parallel with BOTH C3 and C4 because they are in series with each other.

Does that help?

8. Apr 7, 2013

### mathnoobie

Yes greatly, you explained how to find series/parallel connections much better than my book, all my book said was if the charge is equal they are in series, if the voltage is equal they are in parallel.

9. Apr 7, 2013

### mathnoobie

Wait, how is C2 in parallel with C3 and C4 when their voltages don't equal (V2=V3=V4)

10. Apr 7, 2013

### dinospamoni

I haven't calculated anything for voltage, but my guess would be because they shouldn't be equal.

I'd say the voltage across C2 must be equal to the voltage across 3 + across 4.

Voltage is opposite of capacitance:
In series:
Veq= V1 + V2 + ...

1/Ceq=1/C1+1/C2+...

In parallel:

1/Veq= 1/V1 + 1/V2 + ...

Ceq=C1+C2+...

11. Apr 7, 2013

### mathnoobie

They aren't equal, I calculated them. V1=V5, and V3=V4, V2=V3+V4.

My question was though, how can we say that they are in parallel(C2, C3, C4) if their voltages do not equal. I am probably not interpreting your statement correctly.

12. Apr 7, 2013

### dinospamoni

Ah ok good I'm glad you calculated them.

Think of it like this:

There is some Voltage at point A and at point B the voltage must equal zero (This is just in general for a circuit just to get the idea in your head). Now, if a charge makes it from point a to point b, it has lost all of its potential (voltage).

You can think of this the same way as before: identify all the paths current can travel.
Each path must decrease the voltage to zero.

You can go C1 to C2 to C5 OR you can go C1 to C3 to C4 to C5. Each path must bring the voltage to zero.

Since C1 and C5 are in both paths, they both bring down the voltage the same amount in both paths, so don't think about them for now.

This leaves just C2 for path 1 and C3 and C4 for path 2.

If both paths lower the voltage the same amount, V2 must equal V3 + V4

which is what you showed with your voltage calculations

13. Apr 7, 2013

### mathnoobie

Ah, I never thought of using Kirchoff's loop law for some reason, but after you made the connection for me I understand what you mean. Thanks for taking the time to help me :)

14. Apr 7, 2013

### dinospamoni

No problem. Glad I could help :)