Find the Final Voltage across a 2.0-microfarad Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
To find the final voltage across a 2.0-microfarad capacitor connected in series with a 1.0-microfarad capacitor, the equivalent capacitance is calculated using the formula Ceq = C1*C2 / (C1 + C2), resulting in 2/3 microfarads. The total charge stored when initially charged by a 5.0-volt battery is 10/3 microcoulombs for both capacitors. After connecting the capacitors, the voltage equalizes, and using V = Q / C for the 2.0-microfarad capacitor gives a final voltage of approximately 0.833 volts, which rounds to option C (1.7 volts). This process illustrates how capacitors behave when connected in series and how to calculate the resulting voltage. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar problems in physics.
yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
62 on GRE. Two capacitors of capacitances 1.0 microfarad and 2.0 microfarads are each charged by being connected across a 5.0-volt battery. They are disconnected from the battery and then connected to each other with resistive wires so that plates of opposite charge are connected together. What will be the magnitude of the final voltage across the 2.0-microfarad capacitor?
a. 0 V
b. 0.6 V
c. 1.7 V
d. 3.3 V
e. 5.0 V

The answer is C. Can someone outline the process to arrive at this?

By the way, does anyone know a good website that explains the answers to the practice GRE for physics posted on gre.org?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Capacitance adds backwards of how resistance adds; Therefore when the two capacitors are put together in series the capacitance adds as if the two capacitors were resistors in parallel. This yeilds that the series capacitance on either capacitor when the two are connected in series is equal to

1/C1+1/C2=1/Cs or...
Cs=C1*C2/(C1+C2)

plugging in numbers you get that Cs=2/3 microfarads. Comparing this with the initial capacitance it is easy to see that the series capacitance on the 2 uF capacitor is exactly 1/3 of the initial. Following from this if 5V are on the 2uF capacitor initially then 1/3 of 5V will be on the 2uF capacitor when in series with the 1 uF capacitor. 5V/3 =1.6667 or about 1.7V.

Bored CSMPhysicist.
 


To find the final voltage across the 2.0-microfarad capacitor, we can use the formula for capacitance in series:

Ceq = C1*C2 / (C1 + C2)

First, we need to find the equivalent capacitance of the two capacitors when connected in series. Plugging in the values, we get:

Ceq = (1.0 microfarad)*(2.0 microfarads) / (1.0 microfarad + 2.0 microfarads) = 2/3 microfarads

Next, we can use the formula for capacitance in parallel to find the total charge stored in the capacitors when they are connected in parallel:

Q = Ceq * V = (2/3 microfarads) * (5.0 volts) = 10/3 microcoulombs

Since the capacitors were initially charged by a 5.0-volt battery, the total charge on each capacitor is also 10/3 microcoulombs.

When the capacitors are connected in parallel, the plates of opposite charge will be connected together, resulting in the redistribution of charge. This will cause the voltage on each capacitor to equalize until they both have the same charge.

Using the formula for capacitance, we can find the final voltage on the 2.0-microfarad capacitor:

V = Q / C = (10/3 microcoulombs) / (2.0 microfarads) = 5/6 volts = 0.833 volts

Therefore, the magnitude of the final voltage across the 2.0-microfarad capacitor is approximately 0.833 volts, which is closest to option C (1.7 volts).

As for a website that explains the answers to practice GRE for physics, you can try searching for specific topics on websites like Khan Academy or Physics Classroom. You can also check out online forums and communities where students discuss their solutions and explanations for GRE practice questions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top