Engineering Find the flux due to a vector crossing an open surface

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the flux of a vector field across an open surface. The user presents their vector field A as rz~hat(θ) and computes the curl, arriving at the result (z/r)~hat(k) - hat(r). They seek confirmation of their calculation, questioning discrepancies with provided answers. The conversation highlights the importance of ensuring consistent field definitions in vector calculus problems. Accurate verification of vector operations is crucial for understanding flux in open surfaces.
falyusuf
Messages
35
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Attached below.
Relevant Equations
Attached below.
Question:
1646434170915.png

Equations:
1646434303623.png

My attempt:
1646434736987.png


Could someone confirm my answer please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If ## \bf A = rz~ \hat {\bf \theta} ##
then ## \nabla \times \bf A = (z/r)~ \hat {\bf k} - \hat {\bf r} ##
and not what is given.
Different fields ??
 
Thread 'Why wasn’t gravity included in the potential energy for this problem?'
I’m looking at the attached vibration problem. The solution in the manual includes the spring potential energy but does NOT include the gravitational potential energy of the hanging mass. Can someone explain why gravitational potential energy is not included when deriving the equation of motion? I tried asking ChatGPT but kept going in circles and couldn't figure out. Thanks!

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
801
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
974