Find the force of the rod on the point charge

AI Thread Summary
To find the force of a charged rod on a point charge located at a distance D along the perpendicular bisector, the integration setup is crucial. The integral should be evaluated from -L/2 to L/2, considering the symmetry of the system. The vertical component of the force integrates to zero due to this symmetry, while the horizontal component contributes to the total force. Correct limits of integration and proper understanding of the geometry are essential for solving the problem accurately. Mastery of LaTeX is also encouraged for clear communication of equations.
dk321
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rod of length L and total charge Q is a distance D from a point charge q which lies along the
perpendicular bisector of the rod. Find the force of the rod on the point charge


Homework Equations



E = ∫ dE

dq = λdx

F = qE

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm trying to integrate this does the second integral of j go to zero?


(kQ/L) [i\hat D \int _0L dy/(D^2+y^2)^(3/2) -j\hat \int _0^L ydy/ (D^2+y^2)^(3/2)]

sorry for the equation I'm still learning to use latex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dk321 said:
I'm trying to integrate this does the second integral of j go to zero?

The second integral should go to zero due to symmetry. But I don't think you're setting up the limits of integration correctly. The problem statement says the test charge q "lies along the perpendicular bisector of the rod."

In other words, set up the system in your mind such that the test charge is on one of the axis, a distance D from the origin, and the the rod lies on a different (perpendicular) axis such that the center of the rod is at the origin. Then integrate along the rod from -L/2 to L/2.
sorry for the equation I'm still learning to use latex
See the link in my signature for a primer in \LaTeX btw.
 
Last edited:
By the way, as a \LaTeX example, I think the equation you were trying to type in, with limits of integration corrected, is (Right lick on it to see the LaTeX source):

\vec F = \frac{kQq}{L} \left[\int_{-L/2}^{L/2} {\frac{D \ dy}{\left(D^2+y^2 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \hat \imath} + \int_{-L/2}^{L/2} {\frac{y \ dy}{\left(D^2+y^2 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \hat \jmath} \right]
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top