Which Compound Could Be X?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cyt91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying compound X based on the products formed from its combustion. When 1.11 g of compound X is burned, it produces 1.98 g of carbon dioxide and 0.81 g of water. Participants analyze the chemical equations and the contributions of carbon and hydrogen from the products to determine the possible identity of X. The key is to calculate the moles of carbon and hydrogen generated and assess if their combined mass aligns with the initial mass of compound X. The conclusion indicates that the correct answer is option B, CH3CH2COOH.
cyt91
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When 1.11 g of a compound X is completely burnt,1.98 g of carbon dioxide and 0.81 g of water were formed. Which of the following could be X?

A. CH_{3}CH_{2}CH_{3}
B. CH_{3}CH_{2}COOH
C.CH_{3}COCH_{3}
D.C_{6}H_{5}CH_{2}OH

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried

C_{x}H_{y} + {x+\frac{y}{4}}O_{2} \rightarrow
XC0_{2} + \frac{y}{2}H_{2}O

but how about the oxygen atom(s) within compound X?

How can I form a balanced equation for X containing O?

Sorry about the equations and formulae... can't get the subscripts in the right positions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The only things in the product that you can be absolutely sure come from the reactant is the carbon and hydrogen. So, from the water and CO2, calculate how many moles of C and H you had to begin with. What's the mass of this amount of carbon and hydrogen - is it enough to account for all of the 1.11 g you had to begin with?
 
Got it. Useful hint.Thanks. Answer's B. :smile:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top