Find the height if an orbiting satellite given only velocity.

AI Thread Summary
To determine the height of an orbiting satellite given its velocity, the relationship between gravitational acceleration and centripetal acceleration must be understood. The gravitational acceleration at the satellite's orbit can be expressed as g' = g * (R_earth^2 / R_orbit^2), where R_orbit is the distance from the Earth's center. By equating this to the centripetal acceleration (g' = v^2 / R_orbit), one can derive the necessary equations without needing to calculate g' directly. The key is to manipulate the equations symbolically, allowing for the calculation of either velocity or height based on the information provided. This approach simplifies the problem and avoids unnecessary complications.
lubo
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An Earth satellite is to be put into orbit at a height of 2 Mm above the Earth's surface. Determine the velocity it must have. Make the following assumptions: (a) the orbit is circular; (b) the Earth is a sphere of radius 6•37 Mm; (c) gravity decreases as an inverse square law.


(MY main question is to get an idea of how to find the height above the Earth's surface of the satellite, when you are only given the Velocity of a satellite in orbit).

Homework Equations



g' (acceleration due to gravity at a distance R to the centre of the earth)=g*r earth^2/R orbit^2

a=V^2/r orbit



The Attempt at a Solution



g'=?
g=9.81
r earth=6.37Mm
R orbit=6.37 + 2(height)

g' = 9.81*6.37^2/(2+6.37^2)
g'=5.682m/s^2

a=v^2/R therefore v^2=8.37*10^6 * 5.682 Therefore V=6896 m/s

However if I try to work back using V only V=6896 m/s and find the height 2Mm, I can only use g=9.81. Therefore I cannot find g' to allow me to find Ro (re + h). Then I could take Ro from re and I would have the height.

i.e. a=v^2/R = 6896^2/r Earth as I don't have R orbit = 6896^2/6.37*10^6 = 7.465m/s^2

If I try g' =mg then I do not have a mass.

If I try a=rw^2 and find w then I can only use re and a=9.81. Therefore I cannot find the g'= 5.682m/s^2

If I substitute g' with rw^2 and get Ro^3=g*r^2/w^2 I am still only using r of Earth and w from r and not a time period or R orbit

I hope all this makes sense, Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lubo said:

The Attempt at a Solution



g'=?
g=9.81
r earth=6.37Mm
R orbit=6.37 + 2(height)

g' = 9.81*6.37^2/(2+6.37^2)
g'=5.682m/s^2

a=v^2/R therefore v^2=8.37*10^6 * 5.682 Therefore V=6896 m/s

However if I try to work back using V only V=6896 m/s and find the height 2Mm, I can only use g=9.81. Therefore I cannot find g' to allow me to find Ro (re + h). Then I could take Ro from re and I would have the height.

i.e. a=v^2/R = 6896^2/r Earth as I don't have R orbit = 6896^2/6.37*10^6 = 7.465m/s^2

So what you did is that you found the value for g at the distance Rorbit, then used g =v2/Rorbit to get v. Then used v to get back Rorbit ?

If you need to get the velocity, why are you getting the height above the Earth's surface for?

Though if you needed to get 'h' using v you would just use

GMm/(R+h)2 = mv2/(R+h)

mass of satellite m cancels out, M and G are constants and so is R.
 
lubo said:
However if I try to work back using V only V=6896 m/s and find the height 2Mm, I can only use g=9.81. Therefore I cannot find g' to allow me to find Ro (re + h). Then I could take Ro from re and I would have the height.

i.e. a=v^2/R = 6896^2/r Earth as I don't have R orbit = 6896^2/6.37*10^6 = 7.465m/s^2
You can't arbitrarily use Rearth just because you don't have Rorbit.
If I try g' =mg then I do not have a mass.
This doesn't make sense at all. You have an acceleration on the lefthand side and a force on the righthand side of the equation. They can't be equal.
If I try a=rw^2 and find w then I can only use re and a=9.81. Therefore I cannot find the g'= 5.682m/s^2

If I substitute g' with rw^2 and get Ro^3=g*r^2/w^2 I am still only using r of Earth and w from r and not a time period or R orbit

I hope all this makes sense, Thanks for any help.
The problem is you're trying to find a number for an intermediate result, g', that you don't have enough information to find. You don't need to calculate the number, though.

The way you solved the problem initially was saying the acceleration due to gravity the satellite experiences isg' = g\frac{R_\mathrm{Earth}^2}{R_\mathrm{orbit}^2}This acceleration is also the centripetal acceleration needed for the circular orbit, so you have
g' = \frac{v^2}{R_\mathrm{orbit}}
Now if you had combined these two equations, you would have gotten
g\frac{R_\mathrm{Earth}^2}{R_\mathrm{orbit}^2} = \frac{v^2}{R_\mathrm{orbit}}
If, as in this problem, you're given Rorbit, you can solve for the speed v. On the other hand, if you were given v instead, you could solve the equation for Rorbit. In either case, you don't need to calculate the value of g'.

Avoiding the stumbling block you encountered is one of the reasons why your instructor has likely encouraged you to work out problems symbolically and to plug numbers in only near the end. I really encourage you to get into this habit. It'll save you a lot of headaches down the road.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top