Find the mass of the merry go round: conservation of angular momentum?

AI Thread Summary
A child applies a tangential force of 41.6 N on a merry-go-round with a radius of 2.40 m, causing it to reach an angular speed of 0.0850 rev/s in 3.50 seconds. The discussion revolves around calculating the mass using the conservation of angular momentum and torque equations. The initial calculations led to an incorrect mass of 713.7 kg, while the correct mass is 227 kg. Key errors included not converting angular speed from revolutions per second to radians per second and incorrectly assuming the placement of the child on the merry-go-round. The correct approach involves using the moment of inertia solely for the merry-go-round, avoiding the addition of an extra mass term.
n.hirsch1
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A child exerts a tangential 41.6 N force on the rim of a disk-shaped merry-go-round with a radius of 2.40 m.
If the merry-go-round starts at rest and acquires an angular speed of 0.0850 rev/s in 3.50 s, what is its mass?

Homework Equations


torque = r * F
(I + mr^2) ω / t = torque
I of a solid disk = 1/2 mr^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the tangential torque to be 99.84 N/m, and set the momentum equation to it, plugging in the moment of inertia. I got 713.7, and the answer is 227 kg. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two things:
i) Note that the angular speed is given in revolutions/second, not rad/s.

ii) In your second equation, what are you assuming about the placement of the child? Does this assumption make sense?
 
Once I convert the angular velocity, I can get the correct answer if I multiply it by 2:
2 * [(torque * t) / (angular velocity)] = m*r^2
Why does it work this way and not the other way?
 
The only moment of inertia in question here is just that of the merry go round (i.e 1/2mr^2) with m as the mass of the merry go ground. I think the way you were doing it, you put an extra object of mass m on the rim (so you had an extra +mr^2 term)!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top