Find the Minimum Mass to Turn a 36 KG Round Table Over

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum mass required to tip a 36 kg round table supported by three legs, the torque exerted by the applied mass must equal the torque from the table's weight. The calculation involves using the table's circumference to express distances in terms of the radius. The correct approach shows that when the mass is placed between two legs, the torque from the applied force must balance the torque from the table's weight. The final calculation reveals that a mass of 36 kg is needed to achieve this tipping point. Understanding the relationship between force, distance, and torque is crucial for solving this problem correctly.
Jacob87411
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
Three legs placed equal distances apart on the edge support a 36-kg round table. What minimum mass, placed in the table's edge, will cause the table to turn over? Hint: Place the mass equally inbetween two legs.

Im studying for my exam and going through problems I got wrong, trying to fix them, here's what I did.

Each leg supports 12 KG, 117.6 N.

FD = Force down, one that's beeing applied.
C = Circumference of the table

Sum of the torque = FD(1/6C) - 117.6(1/3C) - 117.6(1/3C)

Since I don't have direct measurements of the table, the distance I put in terms of circumference, using one of the legs that the force is being put in between as a rotation point. I came out with:

1/6(FD) = 78.4
FD = 470.4 N
Mass = 48 Kg

The answer is 36, any help is appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the table is just about to tip, the torque exerted by the applied force will equal the torque exerted by the weight of the table. The axis of rotation is the line joining two legs: Find the torques that the forces make about that line. Hint: find the distance the forces are to that line in terms of the radius R.
 
Thanks, I got it to work out
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top