Find the one dimensional particle motion in a given potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding one-dimensional particle motion in various potentials, specifically U(x) = V(tan^2(cx)). The initial approach of solving for x(t) raises concerns about the feasibility of finding an analytical solution. There is speculation that the question may involve determining the period of oscillatory motion, though this is not explicitly stated. The potential has an equilibrium point at x = 0, and the even nature of tan^2(x) suggests symmetry in the motion. The conversation hints at using relationships between acceleration, velocity, and position to describe the motion qualitatively rather than analytically.
Fallen Seraph
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I'm not looking for a solution, but rather trying to understand the question.

We've been given a series of potentials, U(x), and have been told to find the one-dimensional particle motion in them. For example:


U(x) = V(tan^2(cx)), V>0

My initial reaction was just to solve it for x(t), but after having found a(x), I'm not so sure that this is possible analytically... (I can't visualise a solution to -ma=2cV(tan(cx))(1+tan^2(cx))

So perhaps the question is asking to find the period of the oscillatory motion? But it certainly doesn't look like that's what it's asking...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I've tried to think of a nice trick using the chain rule or similar, but can't solve -\frac{1}{m}\frac{d}{dt}x(t)= U(x(t)). Could it be you just have to qualitatively describe the resultant motion, or will all of your potentials result in oscillation?
 
Well U(x) = V(tan2(cx)), V>0, has an equilibrium point about x = 0.

tan2 x is an even function about x = 0.
 
since 'a' is a function of x, you can use a = vdv/dx to get v as function of x and then v = dx/dt.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top