Find the Peak of a Curve Defined by Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter davidco2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Peak Point
davidco2
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have a curve defined by some points.
These points represent the pixel brightness on the image sensor

For example get these values:
5 14 60 111 100 37

Where is the brightness peak? Somewhere between pixel 4 and 5... ~4,3

Is there a method to determine this? Something with a name or do you have an idea?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is no way to "determine" from, discrete values, where a curve might peak. Certainly, It would be possible to construct a smooth curve through those points which would have a maximum value of 111. Since there is no reason, here, to think there are values larger than 111, that would seem most reasonable to me. But it would be just as possible to construct a smooth function giving those values that would have a "peak" of any number you wished to give between, say, 5 and 14. Do you have any information in addition to what is given there?
 
This is a cross-section of the laser line and if the center of the line is on 4.3 (numerating above pixels as 1-6) the peak would be over 111
If I draw a graph in Excel using these values and set curve to smooth, the peak is drawn somewhere around 4.3
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top