Find the power of a boat that accelerated

  • Thread starter Thread starter jehan4141
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat Power
AI Thread Summary
A ship with a mass of 3.5x10^7 kg accelerates from 7 m/s to 10 m/s under a force of 4.5x10^5 N over a distance of 2 km. The time taken to traverse this distance is calculated to be 233.33 seconds. The average power required to achieve this acceleration is determined to be 3.9x10^6 watts. A misunderstanding regarding the calculation of average velocity was clarified, emphasizing that it should be (vf + vi)/2. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying formulas in physics calculations.
jehan4141
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
A 3.5x107 kg ship is traveling at 7 m/s. The ship is accelerated forward with a F of 4.5 x 105 N over a distance of 2 km.

What is the final speed? Vf = 10 m/s

How long does it take the ship to traverse the 2 km? T = 233.33 seconds

What is the average power which the engines had to produce to accelerate the ship in part 1? I need help on this please.

You can do P = W/t = (4.5x105 x 2000) / 233.333

P = 3.9 x 106 watts which is the right answer.

However, how come you can't do P = (F)(avg velocity)

P = 4.5x105 * (3/2) = 675000 watts??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Where'd you get your avg velocity from?

You can use this formula, and in fact the two methods are equivalent, since:

P = W/t = Fd/t = F(d/t) = Fvavg

vavg = d/t = 2000 m / 233.33 s = 8.57 m/s

4.5e5 N * 8.57 m/s = 3.9e6 Nm/s (= J/s = W)
 
Ah I see. It looks like you were confused in your formula for avg. velocity. It's (vf + vi)/2 NOT (vf - vi)/2.

(10 m/s + 7 m/s)/2 = 17/2 m/s = 8.5 m/s
 
cepheid said:
Ah I see. It looks like you were confused in your formula for avg. velocity. It's (vf + vi)/2 NOT (vf - vi)/2.

(10 m/s + 7 m/s)/2 = 17/2 m/s = 8.5 m/s


Oh my goodness! Your eyes are so good! I have been using energy formulas all day that do Xf-Xi all day! Such a silly mistake thank you so much! it is so late and my brain if frazzled :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top