Find the range of possible dimensions for a volume

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the range of possible dimensions for a storage container with a volume of at least 8436 m³, given the relationships between length, width, and height. The user has derived the minimum dimensions as width (w) = 12 m, length (l) = 37 m, and height (h) = 19 m, but is confused about how to express the range of dimensions. It is clarified that while w can be any value greater than or equal to 12, the length and height must be calculated using the equations l = 3w + 1 and h = 2w - 5, which ensures they meet the specified relationships. The final understanding is that w must be at least 12, while l and h are directly dependent on w, thus defining their ranges accordingly.
Traced
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The specifications for a storage container state that the length is 1 metre more than triple the width and the height is 5 metres less than double the width. Find the range of possible dimensions for a volume of at least 8436m^3
Relevant Equations
None
I understand how to get the dimensions that equal 8436m^3. What I don't understand is how to find the range of all possible dimensions.

I solved the inequality to get ##6w^{3}-13w^{2}-5w-8436##

Using systematic guessing I found the root is x=4, so the factor is x-4.

Dividing (x-4) into ##6w^{3}-13w^{2}-5w-8436## gives me ##6w^{2}+59w+703##

so, ##6w^3-13w^{2}-5w-8436 = (w-12)(6w^{2}+59w+703)##.

this means that

w=12
l=3(12)+1=37
h=2(12)-5=19

v=lwh
v=8436

This is as far as I get. I don't understand how to find the range of all possible dimensions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It says the range of dimensions l,w,h of at least 8436 m^3

so l=1, w=1, h=1 gives 1 m^3 which is less than 8436 m^3

But I think you also have to consider the limits for l, w, h ie ##l = 3w## and ##h = 2w - 5##

since h must be greater than 0 then 2w=5 meaning w>=xxx at a minimum and similarly for the maximums too.
 
  • Like
Likes Traced
jedishrfu said:
It says the range of dimensions l,w,h of at least 8436 m^3

so l=1, w=1, h=1 gives 1 m^3 which is less than 8436 m^3

But I think you also have to consider the limits for l, w, h ie ##l = 3w## and ##h = 2w - 5##

since h must be greater than 0 then 2w=5 meaning w>=xxx at a minimum and similarly for the maximums too.

I'm still confused. Could you explain it a bit more please? Right now I have 3 dimensions, l=37, w=12 and h=19. The dimensions I have the minimum dimensions that will give a box of ##8436m^{3}##. I'm confused by
But I think you also have to consider the limits for l, w, h ie ##l = 3w## and ##h = 2w - 5##

I guess I could do something like this?

w>=12
l>=37
h>=19

I don't know if that is how the question is meant to be solved though.
 
Last edited:
Traced said:
Homework Statement:: The specifications for a storage container state that the length is 1 metre more than triple the width and the height is 5 metres less than double the width. Find the range of possible dimensions for a volume of at least 8436m^3
Relevant Equations:: None

I understand how to get the dimensions that equal 8436m^3. What I don't understand is how to find the range of all possible dimensions.

I solved the inequality to get ##6w^{3}-13w^{2}-5w-8436##
That's not an inequality -- it should include <, or >, or >=, or <=.
The actual inequality is ##w(3w + 1)(2w - 5) \ge 8436## (##m^3##).

What you solved was the equation ## w(3w + 1)(2w - 5) = 8436##

Traced said:
Using systematic guessing I found the root is x=4, so the factor is x-4.

Dividing (x-4) into ##6w^{3}-13w^{2}-5w-8436## gives me ##6w^{2}+59w+703##

so, ##6w^3-13w^{2}-5w-8436 = (w-12)(6w^{2}+59w+703)##.

this means that

w=12
l=3(12)+1=37
h=2(12)-5=19
Assuming your algebra is correct, if w, l and h are as above, you'll get the minimum volume. If you increase w, that will cause l and h to increase, and result in a larger volume. So the range for w is ##w \ge 12##. What would be the ranges for l and h?
Traced said:
v=lwh
v=8436

This is as far as I get. I don't understand how to find the range of all possible dimensions.
 
  • Like
Likes Traced and Delta2
Traced said:
I guess I could do something like this?

w>=12
l>=37
h>=19

I don't know if that is how the question is meant to be solved though.
I think you added this after I started my earlier reply. I believe you're on the right track here, but you still need to work in the constraints that l = 3w + 1, and h = 2w - 5.
So you'll have an inequality for w, but equations for l and h, both of which are in terms of w.
 
  • Like
Likes Traced
Traced said:
found the root is x=4
You mean w-12, right?
Traced said:
how to find the range of all possible dimensions
Does the polynomial you found have any other real roots?
What does that tell you about the values it takes as you increase w?
 
Mark44 said:
I think you added this after I started my earlier reply. I believe you're on the right track here, but you still need to work in the constraints that l = 3w + 1, and h = 2w - 5.
So you'll have an inequality for w, but equations for l and h, both of which are in terms of w.
Sorry I'm still confused. I'm just not really understanding this.
 
Traced said:
Sorry I'm still confused. I'm just not really understanding this.
From the problem statement in post 1:
Traced said:
The specifications for a storage container state that the length is 1 metre more than triple the width and the height is 5 metres less than double the width.
From post 3:
Traced said:
w>=12
l>=37
h>=19
The first inequality is correct, but l and h are constrained by the conditions in the problem statement. So w can be any value >= 12, but the values of l and h depend directly on the value of w.
 
Mark44 said:
From the problem statement in post 1:

From post 3:

The first inequality is correct, but l and h are constrained by the conditions in the problem statement. So w can be any value >= 12, but the values of l and h depend directly on the value of w.
Do you mean like this?
l>=3w+1 and h>=2w-5?
This way the length and the height have the constraints.
 
  • #10
Traced said:
Do you mean like this?
l>=3w+1 and h>=2w-5?
This way the length and the height have the constraints.
No. Here's what I mean:
##w \ge 12##
##l = 3w + 1##
##h = 2w - 5##
w can take on any value 12 or larger, but the two equations guarantee that l and h satisfy the given constraints. They wouldn't do so with the two inequalities you wrote.
 
  • Like
Likes Traced
Back
Top