Find the ratio of maximum height to radius of planet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of maximum height to the radius of a planet for a projectile launched at 61% of the escape speed. The initial attempt incorrectly applies kinematic equations that are not suitable for scenarios where the height is comparable to the planet's radius. It is emphasized that the gravitational acceleration "g" used in calculations is distinct from the universal gravitational constant "G." The correct approach involves using the conservation of energy principle in the gravitational field. The conversation highlights the importance of selecting appropriate equations for varying conditions in physics problems.
Elm956
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hint: Disregard any dissipative effects of the
atmosphere of the planet.

A projectile is launched from the surface of a planet (mass M, radius R)
with a launch speed equal to 61 percent of the escape speed for that
planet. The projectile will rise to a maximum height and fall back to the
surface of the planet. What will be the ratio of its maximum height above
the surface to radius of the planet, h/R?

Homework Equations


1/2mv² = -Gmm/R
Vf² = Vi² - 2gh

The Attempt at a Solution


1. 1/2mv² = -Gmm/R
v² = -2Gm/R
v = .61√(2Gm/R)

2. Vf² = Vi² - 2gh
0 = Vi² - 2gh
Vi² = 2gh
Vi = √2gh

3. .61√(2Gm/R) = √(2Gh)
.7442(Gm/R) = 2(Gmh/R²)
.7442Gm = 2(Gmh/R)
.7442 = 2h/R
h/R = .3721

Any thoughts or advice on the incorrect answer? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You made two serious mistakes:

i. You can not apply the formula Vf² = Vi² - 2gh when the height a projectile reaches is comparable with the radius of the planet.

ii. "g" in the formula above is the free -fall acceleration at the surface of the planet, and entirely different from the universal gravitational constant G.

Use the law of conservation of energy in the gravitational field of the planet.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top