Find the relative mass of the blocks (thermochemistry)

AI Thread Summary
To find the relative masses of a copper block at 100.0°C and an aluminum block at 20.0°C, which reach a final temperature of 60.0°C, the heat exchange principle is applied. The equation mcΔT is used, where the specific heats for copper and aluminum are 0.386 J/g°C and 0.900 J/g°C, respectively. The discussion clarifies that "relative mass" refers to the mass ratio of the two blocks. It is suggested that this ratio can be derived from the specific heat capacities, assuming equal heat loss and gain. A heat balance equation involving the masses of aluminum and copper is recommended for solving the problem.
Ritzycat
Messages
170
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A block of copper at 100.0° C comes into contact with a block of aluminum at 20.0°C. The final temperature of the blocks is 60.0°C. What are the relative masses of the blocks?


Homework Equations


mcΔT
copper specific heat = .386 J/g°C
aluminum specific heat = .900 J/g°C

The Attempt at a Solution



(x)(.386 J/g°C)(40°C) = (x)(.900 J/g°C)(-40°C)
what I use to try to find the mass, assuming that the energy lost in one part of the system is gained by the other... Also, what is meant by "relative" mass in this question?

Until I realize this equation cannot be solved...

Any help is appreciated not really sure how to go about doing this problem, I feel like I am missing something because this should be very easy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ritzycat! :smile:
Ritzycat said:
… What are the relative masses of the blocks?
… what is meant by "relative" mass in this question?

I think they mean: what is the ratio of the two masses (ie what is one mass relative to the other).

(imo, this is not a correct use of the words "relative masses" :redface:)
 
Thanks for the response.

If the question is referring to ratio, wouldn't the ratio of their masses simply be the ratio of the specific heat capacities? (given the absolute value of delta T is the same)
 
What can you say about the heat loss/gain of each block?
 
Ritzycat said:
If the question is referring to ratio, wouldn't the ratio of their masses simply be the ratio of the specific heat capacities? (given the absolute value of delta T is the same)

Only if you can prove it. Just write heat balance using m_{Al} and m_{Cu} and solve for \frac {m_{Al}} {m_{Cu}}.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top