Find the universe point of origin based on location of cellestrella bodies?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impossibility of pinpointing a singular point of origin for the universe due to the nature of the Big Bang, which was not an explosion in space but rather an expansion of space itself. Observations reveal that all celestial bodies appear to be moving away from each other uniformly, making every location in the universe seem like the center. The universe is homogeneous, lacking a preferred direction of expansion, which contradicts the idea of a specific origin point. The rate of expansion is quantified by the Hubble Constant, indicating that distant galaxies recede faster based on their distance. Ongoing research continues to explore whether the universe is infinite or finite, impacting theories about its eventual fate.
whatzzupboy
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Can we find...

Is it possible for us to find the universe point of origin based on location of cellestrella bodies? If so how? If not why?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No. Everything in the universe started at the same 'location' [big bang] then moved apart. No matter where you are in the universe now, it appears you are still at the center. Why? Because everything you look at appears to be moving away and the recession velocity solely depends on it's distance, not direction. The universe is also homongenous. Matter is not preferentially distributed in any direction.
 
But if it was created by an explosion then why can't we take surronding glaxie's distanc from us and the speed there movie as well as the direction and work backwards? Oh and why do we think of our universe as infinite space if it is only going to collaps sooner or later. And at what speed is our universe expanding at?
 
The Big Bang was not an explosion of stuff into space. It was the rapid expansion of all space. As such, there is no center or edge to 3D space. Imagine an infinite grid. Now make each grid square/cube twice as big. In that one instant (let’s call it a second), grid point “A” saw its neighboring grid point (point B) take 1 step away (1 step in 1 second)…but a grid point located 2 away (point C) took 2 steps in that same (2 steps in 1 second)…and so on.

Two key concepts to understand:

(1) The farther away someone at point A looks, the faster things appear to be expanding (even though the overall grid has a constant expansion).
A-B-C (start…B is 1 dash away from A and C is 2 dashes away)
A - -B - -C (one expansion step…now B is 2 away and C is 4 away…twice as far in the same second)

(2) Each grid point can see itself as stationary and see all other points expanding away from it.
(point A sees point C moving 4 dashes away, but C sees point A moving 4 dashes away)

If the Big Bang was an explosion of stuff into empty space, then yes, you would expect to see a preferred direction (in this case, our imaginary grid would not have parallel lines…they would converge back to 1 point). But what we actually see is no preferred direction of expansion.

The rate of expansion is expressed by the Hubble Constant...something around 70 kilometers per second per megaparsec...so something 1 megaparsec away from us appears to be receeding 70 kps from us and something 2 megaparsecs away appears to be receeding 140 kps from us, etc.

If the universe is indeed infinite, then it won't collapse. It would expand forever. If the universe was finite, then gravity would pull it all back into a Big Crunch. Still lots of ongoing research to determine whether the universe is infinite or not.
 
Last edited:
whatzzupboy said:
Is it possible for us to find the universe point of origin based on location of cellestrella bodies? If so how? If not why?
Another way of saying what Chronos and Phobos have admirably said is "your heart, whatzzupboy, is exactly the point of origin of the universe; you are truly special." Now before you get too high on this thought, remember that it's equally true of all hearts in the universe, whether they be homo sap. hearts or the heart at the core of every one of the 10>80 baryons.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top