Find V_0 in the circuit (6 elements)

  • Thread starter Thread starter VinnyCee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Elements
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating V_0 in a circuit using conservation of energy principles. The power contributions from various circuit elements are summed, leading to the equation 3V_0 = 54W, resulting in V_0 = 18V. Participants clarify that V_0 should be expressed in volts, not watts, correcting a minor unit error. Overall, the calculations are deemed correct aside from the unit confusion. The thread concludes with an acknowledgment of the appropriate forum for such homework questions.
VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0
http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/51/problem120ha2.jpg

Use conservation of energy to solve for V_0.

P_1\,=\,(30V)\,(-6A)\,=\,-180W
P_2\,=\,(12V)\,(6A)\,=\,72W
P_3\,=\,(V_0)\,(3A)\,=\,(3V_0)W
P_4\,=\,(28V)\,(2A)\,=\,56W
P_5\,=\,(28V)\,(1A)\,=\,28W
P_6\,=\,(10V)\,(-3A)\,=\,-30W

\sum\,p\,=\,p_1\,+\,p_2\,+\,p_3\,+\,p_4\,+\,p_5\,+\,p_6

\sum\,p\,=\,(-180W)\,+\,(72W)\,+\,[(3V_0)W]\,+\,(56W)\,+\,(28W)\,+\,(-30W)

3V_0\,=\,54W

V_0\,=\,18\,V

Does this look right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Looks okay until the last step (units).

EDIT -- BTW, this belongs in the homework forums, not the general forums.
 
Do you mean the summation of the p's? I don't see a unit error, could you point it out please:)

I didn't see the "Engineering" Forum over at Homework help section, but now I found it, thanks for the heads up!
 
VinnyCee said:
Do you mean the summation of the p's? I don't see a unit error, could you point it out please:)
Vo should not have units of watts. Just a small typo.
 
OIC, thank you!

V_0 should have units of Volts!

Other than that, the problem looks OK?

I will post other problems in the homework section, thanks for the help!
 
it is right if you are taking (3v) as a combination volt*amp. as previously u have takev 3*vo as power. so it looks right to me.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top