Finding 2D Fermion Gas U/N with Temperature & Area

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy per particle, U/N, for a 2D gas of N fermions at temperature T and area A. The user initially expresses U in terms of the sum of energy levels and their occupancy, using statistical mechanics principles. They derive a relationship involving the chemical potential and density, but find it challenging to express the result in terms of area per particle, a = A/N. Ultimately, they realize their calculations were correct despite initial confusion. The thread emphasizes the complexities of statistical mechanics in deriving thermodynamic properties for fermionic systems.
LizardWizard
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

For a gas of N fermions with mass M in 2D in a region of area A in thermal equilibrium at temperature T, we are asked to find ##U/N## in fuction of ##T## and ##a=A/N##.

The attempt at a solution

I used ##U=\sum(<n_i>\epsilon_i) = \sum(\exp(\beta(\mu-\epsilon_i))\epsilon_i = \exp(\mu\beta)\sum(\exp(-\epsilon_i\beta)\epsilon_i##
from which ##\exp(\mu\beta)=n/\lambda## where ##n=N/V## and ##\lambda=mkT/2\pi\hbar^2##

Now as you can tell expressing this in terms of ##a## is awkward to say the least, did I go wrong in the calculations somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, it was right all along I just got confused for some reason.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top