Finding A and B Given a Function: Gamma's Quest

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gamma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding constants A and B in the function φ defined in the context of a 2D wave equation. Given the boundary condition that relates the partial derivative of φ with respect to x at x=0, the user derives an equation linking A and B. They also establish a relationship between angular frequency ω and wave speed v, leading to the conclusion that A equals negative B. Ultimately, the user confirms their findings, suggesting they have resolved the problem. The conversation highlights the application of calculus in solving wave equation-related problems.
Gamma
Messages
355
Reaction score
11
I have a function defined between 0<x<infinity, and 0<y<b

\phi=cos(\pi y/b) e^{iwt}(A e^{\lambda x} + B e^{-\lambda x)}

Given \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} = a cos(\pi y/b)e^{iwt} at x=0
and \omega ^2 = \pi ^2 v^2 n^2 /b^2
need to find A and B.

Above condithion gives one equation for A and B.

How do I find a second equation relating A and B.
Given function satisefies the 2D wave equation.

Pluggig in values in

\frac {\partial ^2 \phi}{\partial x^2 } + \frac {\partial ^2 \phi}{\partial y^2 } = 1/v^2 \frac {\partial ^2 \phi}{\partial t^2 }I get, relationship between v and w. No new info.I would appreciate any hints,THanks,Gamma.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a problem in claculus. I should have posted in there.

Any way,

I have for w,

\frac{w^2}{v^2} =\frac{\pi^2}{b^2} - \lambda ^2

From the given condition \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} = a cos(\pi y/b)e^{iwt}

I have,

a = lambda (A-B) -------------------------(1)

I used the fact that phi(x,y, t) = 0 at x=0, y=0. This boundary condition gives

A = -B ----------------------(2)


A = -B = a /2*lambda -----------------(3)

Does this look right?
 
never mind. I think I got it..

Thanks,
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top