Finding a Basis for a set of vectors

Smazmbazm
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let H be the set of all vectors of the form (a-3b, b-a, a, b) where a and b are arbitrary real scalars. Show that H is a subspace of ℝ^4 and find a basis for it.

Right, I've shown it's a proper subspace, just need help with finding a basis. Is {a-3b, b} a suitable basis for this?

I achieved this but putting the vectors into matrix form

1 -3
-1 1
1 0
0 1

Reducing them to end up with

1 -3
0 0
0 0
0 1

Is this a proper way to solve this question? Thanks in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe so. That basis spans a two dimensional substance, because a-3b, and b-a are both linear combination of the remaining two vectors: a, b. By reducing you show that the two were linear combinations, so they went to zero, and you're left with the two basis vectors. Consider one last modification, though:

##\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
1 & 0 \\
0 & 1 \\
0 & 0 \\
0 & 0
\end{array}
\right]##

The space is just span(a,b).
 
Great, thanks for that. Makes sense
 
What, exactly is your answer? Once you have row reduced, the only 4 dimensional vectors we can get from that matrix are (1, 0, 0, 0) and (-3, 0, 0, 1). That clearly cannot be a basis for this space because the second and third components would always be 0 which is not the case here.

And what do you mean by "Is a−3b,b a suitable basis for this?". a and b, and so a- 3b, are numbers, not vectors and so cannot be a "basis".

Here is how I would do it. H is the set of all vectors of the form (a- 3b, b- a, a, b).

(a- 3b, b- a, a, b)= (a, -a, a, 0)+ (-3b, b, 0, b)= a(1, -1, 1, 0)+ b(-3, 1, 0, 1).

And now a basis, and the dimension, are obvious.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's been so long since I've had linear algebra, that is exactly how it's done. I got caught up with the linear dependence. But, HallsofIvy is exactly correct

$$
a \left(\begin{array}{c}1 \\ -1 \\ 1 \\ 0\end{array}\right) + b\left(\begin{array}-3 \\ 1 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{array}\right) $$gives you the basis vectors. While the subsspace is still dim = 2, it's formed by span##\{\left(\begin{array}{c}1 \\ -1 \\ 1 \\ 0\end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}-3 \\ 1 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{array}\right)\}##.

Sorry about the dodgy reply.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top