Finding a basis given a transformation matrix

enaktan90
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let T : M2,2, --> M2,1 be the linear transformation given by

T ([a b; c d]) = [a-2b ; c-2d]
Fix bases B = { [1 0 ; 0 0], [ 0 1 ; 0 0], [0 0 ; 1 0], [0 0 ; 0 1]} and
C = { [1 ; 0], [0 ; 1]} for M2,2, and M2,1 respectively.


(a) Find the matrix [T]C,B of T with respecct to the bases B and C.

(b) Use the matrix from part (a) to find a basis for Ker(T)

(c) Find a basis D for M2,2 such that:

[T]C,D = [ 1 0 0 0 ; 0 1 0 0 ]


Homework Equations



above

The Attempt at a Solution



I HAVE MANAGED TO DO PART (A) AND (B). CLUELESS ABOUT PART (C)!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Congratulations on doing (a) and (b)! Since you were able to do that, presumably, you know that you can take the linear transformation of each basis element in M_{2,2} in turn, then write the result as a linear combination of the basis in M_{2,1}, the coefficients then being the columns.

Now you want to specify the bases that will give that particular matrix. That will be possible if and only if the given basis is "similar" to the matrix you got in (a).

Here's a pretty obvious way to do it: Since you want the last two columns to be zeroes, choose two independent matrices from the kernel of T (which would have to be 2 dimensional for this to be possible). Now, find two independent matrices that are not in the kernel so that T maps them into [1 0] and [0 1].

Since T([a, b; c, d])= [a- 2b, c- 2d] that means you are looking for 4 matrices such that
1) a- 2b= 1 and c- 2d= 0.
2) a- 2b= 0 and c- 2d= 1. And the matrices in (1) and (2) are independent.
3) a- 2b= 0 and c- 2d= 0.
4) a- 2b= 0 and c- 2d= 0. And the maricex in (3) and (4) are independent.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top