Finding a function for rate of change

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the rate of change for the function θ = arctan(a * (tan β)), the derivative must be found. The derivative of arctan(x) is 1/(1 + x^2), and using the chain rule, the derivative can be expressed as (a sec^2(β))/(1 + a^2 tan^2(β)). This approach effectively describes the instantaneous rate of change at each point along the curve resembling a parabola. For further assistance with derivatives and mathematical functions, Wolfram Alpha is recommended as a helpful resource. Understanding these concepts will clarify the relationship between angle alpha and angle beta.
PennyPuzzleBox
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I was wondering if somebody could help me develop an answer to the question below.

I would like to calculate a rate of change of the following function:

θ = arctan (a * (tan β)) where "a" is a constant.

By the way, the shape of the curve -- angle alpha as a function of angle Beta --resembles an arm of a parabola. Angle Beta increases with angle alpha, but less so with increasing values.

I would like to derive a function that would describe the instantaneous rate of change at each point of that curve. It would be great if the function would say: hey, this is an arm of a parabola! :)

Unfortunately I took math a very long time ago... I believe I would
need to find the derivative of the function? Could you kindly help me out with this?
thnx

Penny
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The whole point of the "derivative" is that it is the rate of change of a function. The derivative of arctan(x), with respect to x, is 1/(1+ x^2). The derivative of tan(x) is sec^2(x).

So, by the "chain rule", with f= arctan(u) ,u= a tan(x), df/du= 1/(1+ u^2) and du/dx= a sec^2(x), so df/dx= (df/du)(du/dx)= (1/(1+ u^2))(a sec^(x)= (a sec^2(x))/(1+a^2tan^2(x).
 
^ What HallsOfIvy said

If you're looking for an easy way to find derivatives and do other mathsy things, look up wolfram alpha. It's a website that is quite excellent.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top