Finding a Parabola using three points, no equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarlingAly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola Points
DarlingAly
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me with this problem? I already turned it in, knowing it was wrong, and now I want to know how to do it.

they gave me three points and no equations and expected me to find the standard form and vertex form of the parabola. i don't remember what the points were, so let's just say they were (-1, 0), (3,2), (4,1)

How would you find the two equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, it helps to know what the "standard form" and "vertex form" for a parabola are! The "standard form" for a parabola (with vertical axis of symmetry) is y= ax2+ bx+ c and the "vertex form" is y= a(x- x0)+ y0. For the first, you need to find a, b, and c. For the second, you need to find a, x0, and y0.

In either case use the points you are given to replace x and y in the equation: saying that (-1, 0) is a point on the parabola means that x= -1, y= 0 satify the equation:
0= a(-1)2+ b(-1)+ c. For (3, 2), 2= a(3)2+ b(3)+ c, and for (4, 1), 1= a(4)2+ b(4)+ c. That gives you 3 equations to solve for a, b, and c.

You can do exactly the same thing with the vertex form to find a, x0, and y0.

(If the axis of symmetry is not vertical, 3 points are not enough to determine the equation.)
 
Yeah I knew the standard form and the vertex form. I also knew the equations. It's just that I kept getting fractions while everyone else got the vertex to be a (3, -5) with the numbers i can't remember.. haha

I just wanted to know if anyone did it different.
Thanks!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top