Finding Activation Energy From Arrhenius Plot

AI Thread Summary
To find the activation energy from an Arrhenius plot, the user has plotted ln k against 1/T using half-life data at various temperatures. The temperatures range from 318 K to 338 K, with corresponding ln k values provided. The discussion shifts to the rate law, questioning why the concentration of H2O is often ignored, concluding that it is due to the reaction's rate being independent of H2O concentration as it is a liquid. This highlights the distinction between aqueous and liquid concentrations in rate laws. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts for accurate calculations of activation energy.
BayernBlues
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For a lab, I need to find the activation energy of an experiment from plotting the Arrhenius plot. I have the half-life time of the reaction at various temperatures.

Homework Equations



-Temperature (K)
318
322
327
331
338

-ln k
-6.17
-5.89
-5.65
-5.33
-5.01

-1/T
3.145 x 10^-3
3.106 x 10^-3
3.058 x 10^-3
3.021 x 10^-3
2.956 x 10^-3

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I've plotted ln k vs 1/T.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok forget that. why would the concentration of H2O be ignored in a rate law reaction?
 
Last edited:
It would be ignored if the rate of the reaction was independent of H2O concentration.
 
Because it is a (l) and we only consider the concentrations of (aq) solutions.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top