Finding AGB Star Phases: Modeling S-Process in a Helium Shell Burning Region

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the s-process in stars during the Helium shell burning phase of the AGB (asymptotic giant branch). The user seeks accurate time duration data for the AGB phase to refine their calculations of neutron exposure, which is defined by the equation τ = N*Δt. They have consulted several textbooks but are looking for additional reliable sources to confirm the AGB duration, which they found on Wikipedia to be between 20,000 and 100,000 years. The user expresses a desire for better references and mentions the inconvenience of accessing their astronomy library due to poor weather conditions. Accurate citation practices are also highlighted as an important aspect of academic work.
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Messages
6,735
Reaction score
2,431
Hi!

I have a project where I am supposed to model the s-process in a star in its Helium shell burning region, and i shall do this for a variation of neutron exposure, where neutron exposure are defined as:

\tau = N* \Delta t , t is time. N is number density of neutrons.

So I in principle have calculated everything i need, but what is left is that i don't know the times for different mass of stars where they are in the AGB (asymptotic giant branch), it is in the AGB phase where stars have Helium shell burning outside a C and O burning core. So i must find the time duration of those phases.

I have consulted three textbooks. One is Nuclear Physics of stars by Iliadis, one is Stellar structure and evolution by Prianlik, and one is Modern astrophysics by Caroll.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Carroll!

Malawi, I noticed you misspelling the name of Chandrasekhar in another post today, and I hope you will take this to heart: it's not enough to cite your source, you must also spell the authors' names correctly. And if there is more than one, you should not simply omit the other authors! For example, you should cite the book you probably meant as "Bradley W. Carroll and Dale A. Ostlie, An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, 2nd ed, Addison-Wesley, 2007".

Hope you take this in the spirit suggested--- sounds like you are seriously interested in physics and if so learning to cite properly is part of what you need to learn.
 
Now i was just asking if anyone has a suggestion for duration time of AGB phase. When writing reports and so on I am very skilled at citing my sources correctly, I promise you.

But writing in a forum like these, I can feel more freeley. And what other astrophysics book have similar name to "Modern astrophysics by Caroll", there is no doubt what sources I have consulted.

Now I have found on wikipedia that AGB lasts for 20 -100 000years, so now I can calculate some ranges for the Neutron exposure. But I really want better sources, so if anyone has it/know it , please contact me. Otherwise I must go through half the city just to get to my astronomy library and search through a lot of books, and the weather in sweden is kinda sucky now =/
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top