Finding amplitude of a baby in cot

  • Thread starter Thread starter charmedbeauty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a baby bouncing in a crib modeled as a spring system. The problem includes calculating the frequency of oscillation and determining the minimum amplitude required for the baby to lose contact with the mattress.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for the frequency of oscillation and question the approach for determining the minimum amplitude needed for the baby to leave the mattress. There is a focus on understanding the relationship between spring force and gravitational force.

Discussion Status

Some participants confirm the correctness of the method for part a) while expressing uncertainty about the requirements for part b). There are suggestions to reconsider the problem's wording and the necessary calculations, with various interpretations being explored regarding the conditions under which the baby would leave the spring.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may lack sufficient information for a definitive calculation regarding part b), and there is a mention of common sense reasoning being applicable. The discussion also highlights the importance of distinguishing between forces and amplitudes in the context of the problem.

charmedbeauty
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A baby bounces up and down in her crib. Her mass is 10.5 kg, and the crib mattress can be modeled as a light spring with force constant 654 N/m.

The baby soon learns to bounce with maximum amplitude and minimum effort by bending her knees at what frequency?

b)If she were to use the mattress as a trampoline—losing contact with it for part of each cycle—what minimum amplitude of oscillation does she require?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



for the first part I just did

T=2∏√(m/k)

and f=1/T

f= 1.256

for part b)

ω=2∏/T

T=1/f

ω=2∏(1.256)

=7.89

is this method correct for b)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method for part a) looks correct. But for part b) you have calculated the natural angular frequency of the system, but the question hasn't asked you to do this. part b) is a slightly odd question. It asks for the required amplitude of oscillation such that the baby leaves the mattress. I don't think there is enough information to find the answer to part b), was there anything else given in the question?

Edit: Oh, I think for part b) you are just supposed to give a word answer. It is a common sense answer, really. You need to think about the situation, no calculation is needed.
 
BruceW said:
Your method for part a) looks correct. But for part b) you have calculated the natural angular frequency of the system, but the question hasn't asked you to do this. part b) is a slightly odd question. It asks for the required amplitude of oscillation such that the baby leaves the mattress. I don't think there is enough information to find the answer to part b), was there anything else given in the question?

Edit: Oh, I think for part b) you are just supposed to give a word answer. It is a common sense answer, really. You need to think about the situation, no calculation is needed.

No its definitely a calculation it has a cm units marked next to it.
 
For part b), Is this actually pretty easy? Can you just find the spring displacement that would result in an initial acceleration of -9.8m/s^2 if freely released? So the baby would be accelerating downwards at a lesser rate than the cot spring... leaving the spring?
 
magin said:
For part b), Is this actually pretty easy? Can you just find the spring displacement that would result in an initial acceleration of -9.8m/s^2 if freely released? So the baby would be accelerating downwards at a lesser rate than the cot spring... leaving the spring?

you mean find the spring force necessary to overcome the weight force?
 
Yes, would this be correct?
 
magin said:
Yes, would this be correct?

no

since your asked to find amplitude not force.
 
and at a displacement of about 16cm... the spring force and baby are in equilibrium
 
I don't think I am wording myself clearly.

If the baby and the mattress were attached to each other, and you pulled the baby upwards by 16 cm and then released it, then the spring force on the baby would result in a downwards acceleration greater than g. The baby and the spring aren't attached however, so it would leave the spring. I think it is fair to think of it like this, at the peak of each oscillation, the baby and spring are momentarily stationary...
 
  • #10
magin said:
I don't think I am wording myself clearly.

If the baby and the mattress were attached to each other, and you pulled the baby upwards by 16 cm and then released it, then the spring force on the baby would result in a downwards acceleration greater than g. The baby and the spring aren't attached however, so it would leave the spring. I think it is fair to think of it like this, at the peak of each oscillation, the baby and spring are momentarily stationary...

maybe try

A=(gm)/k

that should be right
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K