Finding Angular Displacement in a Pirouette

AI Thread Summary
A dancer completing 2.2 revolutions in a pirouette has an angular displacement calculated as 2.2 revolutions multiplied by 2π, resulting in 14 radians. The confusion arises from the concept of angular displacement, which is the difference between the final and initial angular positions. Since the dancer returns to the starting point after 2 full revolutions, the effective angular displacement is indeed 0.4 radians for the additional 0.2 revolutions. However, the total angular displacement over the entire motion is still 14 radians, as it accounts for the complete rotation. Understanding the distinction between total rotations and effective displacement is crucial in solving such problems.
Spartan301
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hey, I have a very easy problem.

A dancer completes 2.2 revolutions in a pirouette. What is her angular displacement?

here's my work.
Given:
2.2 revolutions.

Battle Plan:
Find angular position in radians.
Subtract final position with the initial position.

Outcome:
2.2 x 2pi = 4.4 pi radians
=13.823
sig figs: 2
=14 rad

The key says 14 rads is correct, but I'm confused because I thought that you had to subtract the final position from the initial position.

If I did that to find the true angular displacement, wouldn't it be something like 0.4 rads?

Does my math look correct, or is there a concept I'm missing?

Thanks so much.
-Tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The initial angular displacement is zero.
 
SammyS said:
The initial angular displacement is zero.

Certainly. But she passes 0 two times. After that she only rotates for about 0.2 revolutions, right? Wouldn't that be the angular displacement instead?

-Tom
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top